2,996 people were killed and more than 6,000 others were wounded during the attacks, moment of silence for all those poor people and their families.
Country X does not have a healthy economy. The prices for basic goods have increased. Fewer people in country X have jobs, and output has fallen along with the country’s GDP. These events have led to fewer people being able to afford college. On the other hand, country Y has a healthy economy. Its output as shown by GDP is increasing. The prices are fairly stable in country Y. More people have jobs, and they have an opportunity for higher education.
This doesn't mean the all the effects are bad, like for example crime has gone down a lot since lock down started. Also the oceans have been really clean too, like in Italy the canal there has been dirty for many years because of tourists and people not caring for the water, but since everyone has been staying home it's clean like really clean. Even the ducks that used to live in the water came back, people who lived by the canal said the haven't seen the water that clear in years. Corona-virus has taken it's toll on people lives which is very sad, however we as people have to realize that maybe this change was need maybe now can see how we are treating our communities and our Earth and try to change for the better.
i would choose c as well
Answer:
The Nazi Party adopted official anti-Semitic policies because party members needed a scapegoat.
The Nazis blamed almost every single bad event in the recent history of Europe on the Jews and especially Hitler blamed them for the things that happened to German after world war 1. Since many Jews owned businesses while other germans were out of a job and didn't have bread to eat they quickly started to believe the things that Hitler was saying. Not everyone, of course, believed in that nonsense but enough did.
The correct answer is B. It has caused spending by interest groups to increase. Since the ruling, multi-billion corporations and other interest groups have funneled unprecedented amounts of money to the parties or politicians that are susceptible to further their interests via the Super PACs (that are not allowed to spend money directly in the politicians' campaigns but can spend unlimited amounts of funds independently and in favor of the party/politician of their choice).
