Hey I also think the answer is B but I might be wrong
The Iran-Contra affair was a scandal involving the US and Iran. Iran was at an arms embargo at the time, so no arms were supposed to be sold to this country. The US though was secretly selling arms to Iran. This came out on the surface and became a big scandal. The US administration was trying to justify this move that they have done it order to free American hostages held in Lebanon by Hezbollah, but it turned out that the arms sale started much earlier then that. Apart from having a badly damaged reputation, both at home and on the international scene, the US success in the region was also damaged. The Arab world was a sworn enemy of Iran, and they thought that the US is their friend and protector, but it came on surface that the US is arming their enemy, so it disrupted the relations with these countries for the time being.
In this case the new police chief promotes a legalistic (option A) policing style. This mean he focuses on fining law violators, on threatening the population and on arresting criminals. This policing style is very common in big cities with a diverse population because it standardizes a set of rules for everyone, but a legalistic approach portrays the police as a strict institution which may cause social discomfort.
Answer:
1.No protection for the common man
2.Divide and rule
Explanation:
1.No protection for the common man: There is no protection for the common man as the leaders itself try to misuse or misbehave in public. Even security personnel and police treat injustice differently. They favor those in power or wealthy and neglect or even cause trouble to those who are sick or weak socially.
2.Divide and rule: The leaders try to play divide and rule games. They, divide the people based on religion, caste, languages, etc. and try to gain votes to get power though there are not worthy to rule the state or country.
