1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
STALIN [3.7K]
3 years ago
14

How does Laurier’s compromise reflect education in Canada today?

History
1 answer:
Lemur [1.5K]3 years ago
5 0

Explanation:

his death 17 Feb 1919        some things i read on it “Canada has been modest in its history, although its history,” said Laurier in 1904, “is only commencing.… The 19th century was the century of the United States. I think we can claim that Canada will fill the 20th century.”In external relations, his objective was to improve Canada's position relative to both the United States and Great Britain. In 1897, he opposed efforts by British authorities to draw Canada into a closer imperial federation. During the South African War (1899–1902), he again chose compromise between English Canadians — who supported military involvement — and French Canadians — who vehemently opposed it. By allowing for the recruitment of a contingent of volunteers, partially paid for by Britain, Laurier found the middle ground. When imperialists demanded that Canada assist the British Royal Navy, which was struggling to stay ahead of the German navy, Laurier compromised. In 1910, he helped pass the Naval Service Act, which established the Naval Service of Canada (later, Royal Canadian Navy). this is just wat i've read an think so plz don't be mad im just trying to help

You might be interested in
PLS ANSWER DUE LATER TODAY!!!
ser-zykov [4K]

Answer:

no answer just trying to get more points

Explanation:

sorry sorry sorry sorry

3 0
3 years ago
Who did the McNamara haugen bill help
Gnoma [55]
McNary-Haugen help farmers
8 0
4 years ago
HELP!
kondor19780726 [428]

Answer:

She warns that men who did not give their wives authority would be unhappy

Explanation:

In Geoffrey Chaucer's "The Canterbury Tales," the Wife of Bath asks the Knight whether he prefers to have a submissive ugly wife or a beautiful but unfaithful one. Since the Knight lets her make the decision, at the end of the story she has the power to decide over her husband. Thus, she warns women not to please men and to marry the gentle and respectful ones.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In his raid on harpers ferry, john brown intended to
Andre45 [30]

The purpose of John Brown in his raid of Harpers Ferry in Virginia was to spark a slave uprising.

On October 16, 1859, the radical abortionist that was known as John Brown led a small raid on the military arsenal of the United States at Harpers Ferry.

It should be noted that the reason for engaging in the act by John was to incite a slave rebellion. He wanted to seize weapons to give to the slaves.

Read related link on:

brainly.com/question/25696360

5 0
3 years ago
Which case would the Supreme Court hear through its original jurisdiction power? a state that sues another for violating interst
Dimas [21]

____________________________________________________

Answer:

Your answer would be A). a state that sues another for violating interstate trade

____________________________________________________

The case that the Supreme Court would hear through its original jurisdiction power is a state that sues another for violating interstate trade.

____________________________________________________

Definitions:

Jurisdiction power:

Jurisdiction power is the power for the jury to hear a case for the first time, this means that the court is the first to hear about the case.

____________________________________________________

Explanation:

The reason why answer choice "A).  a state that sues another for violating interstate trad" is the correct answer because this is a big case that needs to be sent to the Supreme Court as soon as possible.

This is a cause that wouldn't be seen first by the lower courts, or courts that are below the ranking of the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court would use its jurisdiction power to hear this case first. A state suing another state involves the government, since they're the ones that have the power to sue for the state. This case would pretty much involve the government, which the Supreme Court needs to make sure that it could be solved as soon as possible. Interstate trade is pretty much known as trades that are from one state to another state, and in the answer, it's saying that a state is suing another state for violating state to state trading. Trading is very important in the U.S, and it's more important to get trades from other fellow states, if there is a problem between the states, it needs to be focused on to reduce the tension of hatred.

____________________________________________________

Why the other answer choices are incorrect:

The reason why answer choice "B). a man convicted of a crime based on false evidence " is incorrect because:

This is the type of case that would first be seen by the lower courts, and doesn't need to Supreme Court to be involved, since this is a case that would happy in a local community. The community court will deal with this case first. This is the reason why this answer choice would be eliminated.

The reason why answer choice "C). a teacher prohibited from praying in a school cafeteria" is incorrect because:

This is another case that would be first seen the the lower court, or local court. This is also a case that doesn't need the Supreme Court to be involved in. The lower court will deal with these types of cases, since it's not ideal to the whole country. This is the reason why this answer choice would be eliminated.

The reason why answer choice "D). a reporter whose First Amendment rights are violated" is incorrect because:

This is also another case that would first be seen the the lower courts. If someone's amendment rights were violated, then they would see a local court. They wouldn't see the Supreme Court be cause the Supreme Court wouldn't want to deal with a case like this, since it's not their job to deal with a case like that, that's the job for the lower courts. This is the reason why this answer choice would be eliminated.

If you see the trend, all of the answer choices are wrong because they do not need the involvement of the Supreme Court for the case. Those types of cases should be dealt with the lower courts; they're the ones that are suppose to see this case first.

____________________________________________________

<em>-Julie</em>

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • define in your own words the meaning of the unalienable rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. in your response,
    12·1 answer
  • Which laws seem similar to laws we have today?
    7·1 answer
  • Bush’s invasion of Panama was
    11·2 answers
  • Ghana grew powerful because it
    15·2 answers
  • ______ is considered the primary author of the Declaration of Independence.
    15·2 answers
  • Why would African americans like the song “respect”?
    13·1 answer
  • Why is community service important and valuable?​
    7·1 answer
  • Treason is addressed in lines 23-24. What is treason?
    14·2 answers
  • PLEASE HELP ME (PROMISE I WILL MARK YOU AS BRAINLISTI)
    8·2 answers
  • Describe the development of industries and transportation<br> in the South
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!