Answer:
Whilst lateness is inappropriate, the question of punishing students for not writing assignments by exempting them from the exams is a matter for the school's constitution to resolve.
Explanation:
It is usual practice to punish students who turn up late for an exam. To show favoritism by exempting one and leaving the other on grounds of personal preference, race, gender, etc would be unethical.
- Every institution, whether it is in business, religion, education has a written code. The code is binding on all the players in that institution regardless of status or class. Any action taken within the confines of that code (as long as the code is parallel to existing higher laws), will be considered ethical.
- Laws are by their nature designed to be fair and balanced on the leverage of equity. Sometimes they are not, but that is corrected by evolution.
- It is possible for a school to stipulate that writing and submitting all assignments is a compulsory prerequisite to writing the examinations. In this scenario, if a student is exempted from writing an exam due to non-compliance, that would be within the confines of ethical practices.
- Other schools may not have this in their modus operandi. In such an institution, it still behoves the authorities to be fair in how they dispense justice.
- The final place of resolution can also be found in the terms of operation handed over to the schools by their regulator. As already mentioned, regulations are subject to the laws of the state in which such a law is enacted.
All things being equal, however, it is expected that students complete their assignment and submit same on time too. It is common practice for educational institutions to add scores from assignments to the scores from the exams to arrive at the final score for such a course.
In a school where it is the rule to prevent a student from writing the exams due to non-compliance with assignments, what would be unethical is to NOT give the student a chance to demonstrate why they didn't do the assignments.
For more details about ethics, please see the following link:
brainly.com/question/17436962
Cheers
<span>In lyric poetry, the poet is usually perceived as speaking directly to the reader.</span>
Answer:
Telling the truth,even when it's difficult is the best option
To be honest, the government control in "Matched" is pretty unrealistic and it's pretty strict. I don't really think there are any real-life examples of this government control type but...
In "Matched"; you have to die at 80, your husband/wife is chosen by the "matching machine" (I forgot what it is called), you are given three pills (which the red one you must take if instructed and you can't take if they don't say so. If you don't do what they say, you will be punished. You can't really choose your life, and the things you can decide, your not ever allowed to change.
I don't really know any real-life examples of this but I heard that some Asian parents choose who you marry and you have to act like their your queen or king. If you disobey they will probably throw you out of the house.
Yeah but the government control type in the book "Matched" is really strict, and you don't have a lot of freedom.
According to the legend of El Cadejo, god created the <span>while cadejo to protect humans. The correct option among all the options that are given in the question is the first option or option "1". The other options can be easily negated. I hope that this answer has actually come to your help.</span>