The right answer for the question that is being asked and shown above is that: "This action added strain on the economy." By shutting down southern ports, Confederate forces were affected by all of the following EXCEPT <span>This action added strain on the economy.</span>
The answer is B
A group of people who own a corporation are called share holders
Martin Luther King Jr. advocated for nonviolent (peaceful) protests in order to gain civil rights for African-Americans. Malcolm X was similar in the sense that he wanted equal rights, however he was in favor of using violence in order to do this.
Another important Civil Rights leader was Rosa Parks. She refused to give up her seat to a white passenger in a "white only" section of a Montgomery Bus. This resulted in the Montgomery Bus Boycott, which helped end segregation on buses in Alabama.
John F. Kennedy was the man assassinated on November 1963. His assassin was Lee Harvey Oswald. Only one day after Kennedy was killed, Oswald was killed by a Dallas night club owner by the name of Jack Ruby. Even though Kennedy died, his legacy lived on when Lyndon B. Johnson was able to get the Civil Rights Act of 1964 passed. This was a document Kennedy worked on for a long time, unfortunately he was killed before it could pass in Congress.
Over two decades have passed since the dissolution of the communist system and the disintegration of the Soviet Union in 1991 yet there is still no consensus over the causes and consequences of these epochal (and distinct) events. As for the causes, it is easy to assume that the fall was ‘over-determined’, with an endless array of factors. It behoves the scholar to try to establish a hierarchy of causality, which is itself a methodological exercise in heuristics. However, the arbitrary prioritisation of one factor over another is equally a hermeneutic trap that needs to be avoided. Following an examination of the various ‘why’ factors, we focus on ‘what’ exactly happened at the end of the Soviet period. We examine the issue through the prism of reformulated theories of modernisation. The Soviet system was a sui generis approach to modernisation, but the great paradox was that the system did not apply this ideology to itself. By attempting to stand outside the processes which it unleashed, both society and system entered a cycle of stagnation. The idea of neo-modernisation, above all the idea that societies are challenged to come to terms with the ‘civilisation of modernity’, each in their own way, provides a key to developments. In the end the Soviet approach to this challenge failed, and the reasons for this need to be examined, but the challenge overall remains for post-communist Russia.
True because it's supposed to be a moral for the Sumerians and for people to learn what it means for leadership and loyalty