Answer:
if two people are part of a society and one of them has the right to work and earn for himself while the other one is prohibited to do so (i.e. they are unequal before the law), we can safely say that this is an unjust society.
Not the best at law, so i wouldn't completely depend on this^^
Explanation:
Answer:
Promote fairness in the electoral process.
Explanation:
Political favouritism works through favour to a specific media group in the form of government advertisement . It is done to bring about a favourable atmosphere about the government or any other power centre . It is done to create a narrative in favour of the ruling political party.
To counter it on global basis , fairness in the electoral process is advocated by all global leaders. Fairness in electoral process encompasses all such measures that thwart covert effort to influence the people's opinion .
Answer:
because the parking lot owner is the one responsible if any car is stolen
Answer:
The decision of the Supreme Court on Steagald v United States (1981) established that according to the Fourth Amendment, police officers can´t search for a suspect in a third party´s property without getting a search warrant first.
Explanation:
According to the Supreme Court, the search carried in the house of the petitioner, Gary Keith Steagald, which was conducted only with an arrest warrant for Ricky Lyons, and led to Steagald´s arrest, was a violation of the exclusionary rule stated in the Fourth Amendment that protects all citizens from illegal searches and seizures. I do agree with this decision because any effort to apprehend a suspect should never infringe nor his or a third party´s constitutional rights.
Answer:
lma o yes and in my defense they can be very intriguing ;). plus they were asking for it
Explanation:
