1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
prisoha [69]
3 years ago
6

In the past, what has been the MOST common benefit to joining a splinter party? Use details from the text to support your answer

.
History
1 answer:
mario62 [17]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

The advantage was that the political ideologies were defended.

Explanation:

A splinter party was made up of politicians who did not have their convictions and political ideologies defended by either of the two existing parties. Thus, the advantage of joining a splinter party was to have your political ideas defended and supported, without being forced to submit to Democratic or Republican ideologies. Thus, there was more political freedom in relation to the positioning of guidelines.

You might be interested in
HELP ME PLS!! QUICK!!!
seraphim [82]

Answer:

I would say A, but it might be C. Read what I put below and see what you think. Hope this helps! :)

Explanation:

Of course, when he selected Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton for his cabinet, he didn't know that they would become enemies. At first, they got along: Hamilton occasionally asked for Jefferson's opinions, and Jefferson nominated Hamilton for membership in the American Philosophical Society. It wasn't until Hamilton's economic policy began to take shape in late 1791 and 1792 that each man took a closer look at the other and began to wonder about what he saw.

This is one area in which George Washington created some of his own trouble. Eager to convince Jefferson and Hamilton to accept their offices, Washington was a bit too expansive in his descriptions of both jobs. In essence, he led each man to assume that his position was the most important position in the cabinet.

Hamilton became Secretary of the Treasury, convinced that he was a sort of Prime Minister; he often referred to "my administration." And Jefferson, as he boasted to Madison, believed that he was being put in charge of all of the domestic affairs of the nation. Obviously, this led each man to view the other as an intrusive busy-body consistently reaching beyond the bounds of his office.

Things were not made any easier by their obvious differences in personality, which became more apparent over time as their conflicting world views and policy choices came to the fore. Hamilton was many things that Jefferson was not: aggressive, confrontational, openly ambitious. The same holds true in reverse. Jefferson was many things that Hamilton was not: indirect, somewhat retiring, apt to work behind the scenes. Hamilton thus saw Jefferson as sneaky and hypocritical, someone with wild ambition who was very good at masking it. And Jefferson saw Hamilton as a wildly ambitious attack dog who would hammer his way into getting what he wanted. Their own notes and letters offer an insider's view of what it might have been like to have the two of them together in a cabinet meeting.

Jefferson's notes contain complaints about yet another of what Jefferson called Hamilton's forty-five minute jury speeches. And on the opposite side, Hamilton, as he noted in a letter to Washington, couldn't bear the fact that whenever something didn't go Hamilton's way, he could see Jefferson across the table smirking at him.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
BRAINLIEST FOR FASTEST!!! 99 POINTS!!! PLEASE HURRY!!! RIGHT THIS IN YOU'RE OWN WORDS!!! The checks and balances keep each branc
makkiz [27]
What’s the question
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is the dynastic cycle
valkas [14]
It’s a political theory in chinese history. according to the theory each dynasty in chinese history rises to a political, cultural, and economic peak. then because of moral corruption, declines, loses the Mandate of Heaven, and falls, only to be replaced by a new dynasty
7 0
3 years ago
Following the outbreak of war in Europe in 1939, President Franklin RooseveltA. declared that the United States would remain neu
ratelena [41]

Answer:

The correct answer is Option A: Declared the United States would remain Neutral, he supported this decision ith the Neutrality Act of 1937, however even though he was not taking actions against the Nazis they condemend Adolf Hitler actios as well providing arms for the allies.

Explanation:

It wasnt until Pear Harbor that the United States were officially taking action in the war.

8 0
3 years ago
When humans first settled in farming villages,their became more complex
Advocard [28]

Answer:

use own words

Explanation:

When humans first settled in farming villages their?

If you were to look at a map that showed the first farming villages, more than 9,000 years ago, you'd find that they were few and far between. Catal Huyuk was founded in Turkey, while Jericho was located in the West Bank and there were small villages along the Yellow River in China.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Answer Please will rate and more!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    7·2 answers
  • What contradictions between Tecumseh's alliance and soldiers and settlers in the Old North-west reveal? Can you suggest solution
    14·1 answer
  • How would you describe Jedediah Smith’s personality
    11·1 answer
  • How did the babylonians use and adapt sumerian mathematical knowledge?
    14·1 answer
  • How does a person dispose the flag properly?
    6·2 answers
  • What is connection between humanism and painting people working in the fields.
    9·1 answer
  • 14 POINT QUESTION HERE
    13·2 answers
  • Read the passage and answer the question that follows: A slave's life was full of hardships and difficulties. Workdays were long
    12·2 answers
  • A social contract is an agreement between
    6·2 answers
  • Select the correct answer.
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!