<u>Incomplete question. However, I inferred this to be the full question;</u>
Compare and contrast the themes of the poems “Ulysses” and the “Lady of Shalott,” and analyze how the poet incorporates Victorian ideals into the themes.
Answer:
<u>Both poems address the relationship between a woman and a man.</u>
<u>Explanation:</u>
In the poem “Ulysses” by Tennyson we notice a focus about an individual's pursuit for knowledge and experience. Ulysses (a male character) feels that he must look beyond his challenges by seeking new experiences.
In the poem "The Lady of Shalott" also focuses on taking risks to overcome challenges. However, both poems shed some light on the relationship between men and women incorporating the Victorian view of acquiring knowledge which sees women as merely serving their duty in her home and family, and that her interactions with the world is not permissible.
Answer:
Ram: plz... be polite with elders you are very rude.
syam: he is sitting in my beach. how dare he.
Ram: he is old plz give him the sit.
syam : why I should give him my seat?
Ram : bcoz their is no other place to sit.and he is a asthma patient.he is having a inhaler.
syam: I am also tired . I also need to sit.
Ram: you are a young man you can stand for a while but he is a old man plz try to understand.
syam: whatever I am leaving.
old man : thank you
Ram: no problem grandpa. bye I am leaving take care grandpa
.
Answer:
Cheating in the card game at the end of the novel presents the picture of corruption and evil in the political system. The pigs and the humans both were indulged in the same type of corruption and cheating in the card game. This exemplifies the strength of the political power. Whether it be a human or a pig, the nature of the politician changes with respect to that of the power. Mr. Pilkington and Napoleon entered a heated argument in which both of them tried to cheat in the similar way. This brings to the conclusion that both the pigs and the humans played the role of liars, manipulators and hypocrites when the question of politics and humanities were asked.
would "marriage kills" work? that's all I could think of without any further context.
