Answer:
I think it is B.
Explanation:
By process of elimination. It doesn't do any of the things mentioned in the other options.
It DOES NOT give future insight... (A)
It does show changes in U.S. agriculture. (B)
It DOES NOT identify different herbicides. (C)
It DOES NOT explain insect-resistant crops. (D)
and It DOES NOT clarify how to handle changes. (E)
Hope this helps!
I think you can use your own experiences to better understand characters, events, and ideas.
When comparing the man's legs to rubber in context, it sounds like he is unable to walk. Describing his legs as rubber would indicate they bent and bowed under his weight on them. He's probably either injured or lame.
In the passage, it clearly shows that they’re
distant to each other. Even if Wright and his father have had many similarities,
the next set of sentences shows that it antagonizes it. Wright is not close
with his father. He doesn't have a good relationship to his father.