<span>In
the Korean War, even if it ended in a draw, it prevented the spread of
communism to the South. The Bay of Pigs
was an effort to overthrow Castro and restore democracy but failed. The establishment of NATO and SEATO were to
deter communist expansion to Western Europe and Southeast Asia. Marshall Plan helped countries recover from
WWII to prevent the influence of communism.
Vietnam unfortunately was failed attempt to defeat communism as the
North conquered the South. Actually it
was Sino Soviet Part where China broke relations with the Russians and later
Nixon opened relations with China.</span>
An
ahiao estala bareesraspuj
Explanation:
Out of the given options, “it was essential to the rapid movement of goods, workers, and ideas”, the statement best describes the railroad industry in Great Britain during the industrial revolution.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
The industrial revolution witnessed a lot of people migrating from the country to the cities in search of employment. In these period, there was a massive boom in the production of goods along with people travelling to the cities.
The railways helped the people to travel with minimum hassle. Due to the railways goods could be transported to other places by consuming comparatively less time.
There is a general belief that railways helped the industrial revolution to continue by speeding up production and supply of goods and finished products and faster people transportation from one area to another.
Negative one is that they better be careful, And the three positive ones are that you get to cool this and number to is that you get to do fun things and number three is that Friends or other People are always there to help you.
The given statement is False.
People who keep domestic animals are strictly liable for any harm inflicted by the animals.
Explanation:
People keep many type of animals as pets in their homes. Some of the common animals which are being kept as pets are:
So if animals kept by people in their homes harm someone, or something, then the owner of the animal is not liable for it. This is because the animal's behavior is not is control of the people. People can only train them, but to always obey the owner is not in the hands of the owner. The nature of animals may not always remain the same, they can cause harm to things or people, but because they are animals, so the owner is not liable.
For example, a man has a dog as pet and his dog went in the neighbor's garden and dig the soil. In this case the owner is not liable for the damage the dog caused. No doubt the owner could help the neighbor in settling the things together but he is not liable for the damage,
Learn more about animals at:
brainly.com/question/11013494
#LearnWithBrainly