Answer:
£16.50
Step-by-step explanation:






Answer:
x = 75°
Step-by-step explanation:
Sum of the interior angles of a triangle = 180°
Therefore,
78° + 27° + x° = 180°
Add like terms
105 + x = 180
105 + x - 105 = 180 - 105 (substraction property of equality)
x = 75°
Alejandro makes an error in the first steps he divides 8 by 5 which is incorrect he has to divide 5 by 8, and in the second step, he does not multiply the term by 100 and it can be determined by using fraction or percentage.
<h2>Given that,</h2>
Alejandro uses the steps below to convert 5/8 to a percent.
8 divided by 5 = 1.6.,
1.6 = 160 percent
<h3>We have to
determine,</h3>
Which best explains Alejandro's error?
<h3>
According to the
question,</h3>
Alejandro uses the steps below to convert 5/8 to a percent.
8 divided by 5 = 1.6.,
1.6 = 160 percent
The division was computed incorrectly.
The division was completed in the incorrect order. The decimal was moved to the right too many times.
The decimal was moved to the right instead of the left.
Alejandro uses the steps below to convert 5/8 to a percent.
To convert 5/8 into percentages following all the steps given below.
- Step1; Firstly 5 is divided by 8,

- Step2; To convert 0.625 into percentage multiplied by 100,

Hence, Alejandro makes an error in the first steps he divides 8 by 5 which is incorrect he has to divide 5 by 8, and in the second step, he does not multiply the term by 100.
For more details about the Equation refer to the link given below.
brainly.com/question/18187260
ANSWER:
Substitution prop of equality.
I'm not sure but I think this should be the answer.
Hope this helps! :)
Answer: (E) Not necessarily, because this wasn't an experiment
Step-by-step explanation:
As much as the results would suggest that the fast-paced music was responsible for the faster finishing time, this conclusion cannot be authoritatively made because this was not technically an experiment but rather a test to satisfy curiosity.
An experiment is planned and is scientific. It has more stringent requirements that ensure causation that Roshanda did not meet before she engaged in this trial so we cannot say for a fact that her findings are objective.