1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
zhenek [66]
2 years ago
9

Both numbers are prime in which of the following pairs of numbers?

Mathematics
2 answers:
Elden [556K]2 years ago
7 0

Answer:

\huge{ \boxed{ \sf{5 \: and \: 7}}}

☪ Question :

☇ Both numbers are prime in which of the following pairs of numbers ?

☐ 5 and 9

☐ 7 and 9

☐ 5 and 6

☑ 5 and 7 ---- Answer !!

☐ 7 and 8

-----------------------------------------------------------------

☥ Let's explore about prime numbers and composite numbers !!

  • A prime number is a whole number that only has two factors which are one and itself.
  • A composite number is a whole number with 3 or more factors.

\underline{ \text{Still \: confused ?}}

Alright , Let's check all the options :

☐ 5 and 9

⤿ 5 is a prime number as it can only be divided by 1 and itself but 9 is not a prime number as it can be divided by more than two numbers ( i.e 1 , 3 and 9 )

☐ 7 and 9

⤿ 7 is a prime number as it can only be divided by 1 and itself but 9 is a composite number as it can be divided by 1 , 3 and 9.

☐ 5 and 6

⤿ 5 is a prime number as it can only be divided by 1 and itself but 6 is a composite number as it can be divided by more than two numbers ( i.e 1 , 3 and 6 )

☑ 5 and 7

⤿ Yeah ! 5 and 7 are prime numbers as they only have two factors which are one and itself.

☐ 7 and 8

⤿ 7 is a prime number as it can only be divided by 1 and itself but 8 is a composite number as it can be divided by more than two numbers ( i.e 1 , 2 , 4 and 8 )

Hope I helped!

Have a wonderful day ! ツ

~TheAnimeGirl ♡

▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁

mojhsa [17]2 years ago
7 0

Answer:

D. 5 and 7

Step-by-step explanation:

A 5 and 9  => 9 is not a prime number

B. 7 and 9  => 9 is not a prime number

C. 5 and 6  => 6 is not a prime number

D. 5 and 7

E. 7 and 8  => 8 is not a prime number

You might be interested in
one moving company charges $800 plus $16 per hour another moving company charges $720 plus $21 an hour at what number of hours w
Gekata [30.6K]

800 + 16x = 720 + 21x. Cancel out the 720 to get 80 + 16x = 21x. Subtract 16x from both sides to get 80 = 5x. Divide by 5 to get 16 = x, or x = 16. 16 hours. The charge is 800 + 16(16), = 720 + 21(16) which = 800 + 256 = 720 + 336 which = 1,056 = 1,056. Hope this helped!

6 0
3 years ago
Percent of change 125 is increased to 200
Montano1993 [528]

Answer:

60

Step-by-Step Explanation:

(200-125):125*100 =

(200:125-1)*100 =

160-100 = 60

Now we have: What is the percentage increase/decrease from 125 to 200 = 60

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
the half life of c14 is 5730 years. Suppose that wood found at an archeological excavation site contains about 35% as much C14 a
Furkat [3]

Answer:

The wood was cut approximately 8679 years ago.

Step-by-step explanation:

At first we assume that examination occured in 2020. The decay of radioactive isotopes are represented by the following ordinary differential equation:

\frac{dm}{dt} = -\frac{m}{\tau} (Eq. 1)

Where:

\frac{dm}{dt} - First derivative of mass in time, measured in miligrams per year.

\tau - Time constant, measured in years.

m - Mass of the radioactive isotope, measured in miligrams.

Now we obtain the solution of this differential equation:

\int {\frac{dm}{m} } = -\frac{1}{\tau}\int dt

\ln m = -\frac{1}{\tau} + C

m(t) = m_{o}\cdot e^{-\frac{t}{\tau} } (Eq. 2)

Where:

m_{o} - Initial mass of isotope, measured in miligrams.

t - Time, measured in years.

And time is cleared within the equation:

t = -\tau \cdot \ln \left[\frac{m(t)}{m_{o}} \right]

Then, time constant can be found as a function of half-life:

\tau = \frac{t_{1/2}}{\ln 2} (Eq. 3)

If we know that t_{1/2} = 5730\,yr and \frac{m(t)}{m_{o}} = 0.35, then:

\tau = \frac{5730\,yr}{\ln 2}

\tau \approx 8266.643\,yr

t = -(8266.643\,yr)\cdot \ln 0.35

t \approx 8678.505\,yr

The wood was cut approximately 8679 years ago.

5 0
3 years ago
Fifty multiplied by the quantity twenty divided by a number n is greater than or equal to two hundred fifty
Fudgin [204]
4 is the correct answer
8 0
3 years ago
Repost of my question i need help quicklyy help plzz
GuDViN [60]

Answer:

According to logarithmic properties.... The right hand side can be written as

log base 7 (180/3).....which is log base 7 60

So according to the question cancel out the log base 7 from both sides....

Then we get 8r + 20 = 60

That is 8r = 40..

That is r = 5......

Therefore the value of r is 5

8 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • 11.23 grams in word form
    15·1 answer
  • PLLLLEEEAAAASSSSSEEEE HELP!
    13·1 answer
  • Which expression is equivalent to -5(m - 3)?<br> -5(-3 + m)<br> 15m - 5<br> -5(-3m)<br> -3(m - 5)
    15·1 answer
  • At which points does the graph of f(x)=2x−4 cross the x-axis and y-axis?
    10·1 answer
  • I need help on this Algebra question
    5·1 answer
  • A
    9·2 answers
  • A truck travels a distance of 83,580 km in a month and for this travelling it consumes 1 litre of diesel per 12km. How much does
    14·1 answer
  • 200 is times as much as 2
    5·1 answer
  • Please solve these hjgh
    15·1 answer
  • Half of the children in a library group like pets, one fourth don't like pets and seven children do not have any
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!