No, Congress should not have the power to interpret the Constitution. The Constitution of the United States of America states that the legislative branch (including Congress) has the power to MAKE laws. The judicial branch (including the Supreme Court) has the power to INTERPRET laws. By giving the legislative branch the power to interpret the Constitution, you are giving it the powers of the judicial branch. This power must belong only to the judicial branch, NOT to the legislative branch or Congress. (NOTE: I'm not sure if this question is supposed to be a matter of opinion or not--if it is, this is my viewpoint.)
The New England colonists were predominantly Puritans who led strict religious lives. Laws in these colonies assumed that citizens who strayed away from conventional religious customs were a threat to civil order and should be punished for their nonconformity.
Roger Williams (1603 – 1683) was himself a puritan minister from Massachusetts Bay Colony. In his view, any civil authorities had no right to involve themselves in matter of faith. Banished from Massachusetts in 1635, he founded Rhode Island, the first colony with no established church and the first society in America to grant liberty of conscience to everyone.
Massachusetts Bay Colony was therefore the New England colony that did not require all adults to attend church service.
Answer:
The purpose of imperialism is to decrease the strategic and political vulnerability of a nation. Imperialism is necessary to preserve the existing social order in the more developed countries.
Explanation:
pls mark brainliest!
It was for immigration mainly in late 1800's and early 1900's
Racial hatred, paranoia and lack of Native American blood.