In the United States, the Federal Reserve Board of Governors controls federal policy.
Answer is C.
Answer:
Image result for In 1836, despite an earlier Supreme Court decision thatsaid American Indian nations were independent, Presidents Andrew Jackson called for the forced removal of Cherokee Indians from their homelands in the southern UnitedStates. Known as the Trail of Tears, this 1,000-mile journeyto new territory in present-day Oklahoma caused manypeople to die.Interpretation 1 -President Jackson should have respected the decision ofthe Supreme Court and not forced the Cherokee Indian tribes to move.Interpretation 2 - President Jackson was within his rights to ignore theSupreme Court decision if it conflicted with his promise to provide land toAmerican citizens.
Still upset at the results of the 1824 election, he believed in giving the power to elect the president and vice president to the American people by abolishing the Electoral College, garnering him the nickname the "people's president." Campaigning against corruption, Jackson became the first president to widely replace
Explanation:
it's suga, sorry I know this doesn't help I just see that you're BTS fan...
Answer:
it seems as if buddhism was spread all over Asia. Only men are present and they all have bald heads and this might represent purity as their bodies appear to be hairless. The buddha statue shows a buddha with something on his head. That is striking as they are usually seen as bald headed men in cloth rather than with jewellery or hair adorning their bodies.
My predictions: Buddism represents purity of ones mind body and soul. only men can be a part of buddhism
Question: What is the central belief of buddhism?
Think about the idea here and you'll see how the idea of "cost" is inevitable in every decision. (It's true not just of governments, but of our own decisions too -- but we'll focus on governments here.)
Let's say the government decides it wants all citizens to have access to health care. Well, that's going to cost dollars to pay for that health care. Where will those dollars come from?
Let's say the government decides, in response to school shootings or other acts of gun violence, to ban certain types of guns or ammunition. That costs something to the gun dealers who were making money off those sales (and they'll object). Or let's say the government decides to do further and deeper background checks on all gun buyers. Well, that will cost something in terms of personnel and processes to accomplish all the background checks. Or let's say the government decides to increase mental health screenings and treatment because persons with mental illness issues may become violent and dangerous to society. That will cost much in order to organize and carry out better mental health intervention across the country.
I focused on just a couple issues there (health care, gun control). But the same principle holds on anything government does. You can think about your own examples that you'd want to use. Anything the government decides to do comes with some sort of costs attached. That doesn't mean it's bad to make such decisions -- it just means we need to count the cost and invest our efforts where they will have the best benefit.
