Yes. I would have supported Hamilton's econimic plan. It was important to get the states on strong economic footing and to get them depend of the federal government.
Answer:
For the first, I would say being poorly represented.
For the second, ignorance and morals.
Explanation:
A lot of people have been raised to demand a change when they see injustices, some might go at it in a violent way, others might approach it in a more peaceful way. One thing you have to know about making big decisions, is that you will never please everyone. Someone is always going to be mad. It depends on their moral values as people. If you saw something that you thought was morally wrong, you would be upset too. They have tried peaceful protests and weren't heard, now they choose to incite violence because they have a voice and are represented in the media that way.
It all leads down to morals. The media says that if you aren't for it, you're automatically against it. If something the media does or activists do doesn't allign with people's morals, they choose the complete opposite because they think that's their only option.
One of the <em>leading organizations </em>of the temperance movement was the <em>Woman's Christian Temperance Union</em> and they preached abstinence from;
- Alcohol, in the eighteenth century
According to the given question, we are asked to state the things which the temperate movement preached and how the <em>Woman's Christian Temperance Union</em> was such an important fact.
As a result of this, we can see that the temperance movement was made popular in the eighteenth century and as a result of this, they preached for the abstinence from alcoholism and advocated for moderation.
Read more about temperance movement here:
brainly.com/question/2724002
The role of the emperor in the new government was largely
ceremonial and involved acting as a symbol of the state and the unity of the
people. Under Japan’s new constitution new constitution, drafted by U.S. occupation
authorities in 1946 and in effect from 1947, Japan became a constitutional
monarchy. Sovereignty resided in the people and the powers of
the Emperor were severely limited.
