American writers often break from literary tradition because, the audience always wants something new, surprising, unusual, etc. Like anything else on this world Authors change. I believe that writers are justified in challenging the status quo because literacy is an art, and like any kind of art it evolves and changes creating new things. Any attempt to stop change is simply wrong and insult against creativity.
Dear (whatever their name is), some important things about getting an education is if you wanted a job and to get that job you needed a high school diploma or needed to go to college and study to get the job you couldn't get the job because you dropped out or let's say you had a child and they need help on their homework but you don't know it because you dropped out
i did two reasons you do the third and i hope this helps =w=
I chose the 1971 film adaptation by Roman Polanski. I found that the text and film versions are extremely similar.The only distinction lies in the essence of the media that covers it.In the film, the portrayal of the scene is graphical and vibrant.In reality, you see Banquo falling to the floor, dead.In reality, you see Banquo falling to the floor, dead.
In terms of impact on the viewer, Roman Polanski's rendition of this scene is not only accurate but also strong.The specifics are all consistent with the text version: the characters and the environment are the same.The film version captures the character of Banquo to perfection: a courageous and better man than Macbeth, who at the moment thinks only of his son.To ensure Fleance gets to safety, he sacrifices himself.
A. Doesn't Grow
Rice doesn't grow in cold climates.
B and C would not make sense in the sentence above.
