Answer: Quasi-contract
Explanation:
The quasi-contract is one of the type of retroactive agreement between the two parties and this contract is basically created for the purpose of manage the various types of circumstances such as unjust enrichment regarding the various types of products and the services.
The quasi contract is basically created by a judge in the court too avoid all the conflicts in the party so that both the parties manage their expenses accurately.
According to the given question, Mason can seek the recovery on the basis of the quasi-contract between the Chenao and Mason exchange agreement. Therefore, Quasi-contract is the correct answer.
Answer: A1
Explanation: The columns are arranged alphabetically and the rows are ordered numerically. The cell address states the column, a letter, followed by the row, then a number.
Answer:
$5,050.25
Explanation:
The daily interest multiplier has already been stated to reflect interest earned over a 180-day investment timing horizon, hence , in order to determine the compound of $5,000 saved for 180 days, we simply multiply the daily interest multiplier for 180 days by the actual amount saved as shown below:
FV=PV*interest multiplier
FV=future value=amount in the savings account after 180 days=the unknow
PV=the amount placed in savings account= $5,000
interest multiplier= 1.010050
FV=$5,000* 1.010050
FV=$5,050.25
To answer this item, we let x be the current number of chairs. After adding 50 chairs to the current inventory, the total number of chairs would then be equal to x + 50. The equation that would allow us to determine the value of x is written below.
x + 50 = (3/2)(x)
Simplifying the equation,
x + 50 = 3x/2
x - 3x/2 = -50
-x/2 = -50
Dividing both sides of the equation by -1/2, the value of x is equal to 100.
To increase the inventory by 40%, the equation would be,
y = x(1.4) = 1.4(100) = 140
<em>ANSWER: 140 chairs</em>
A worker’s positive reaction to a negative performance review from an employer might be option A "ignore the criticisms made at the review." Option A seems to be the best fit for this question because option B would I consider a negative reaction because addressing the employer over the negative review could start a fight and the other two seem too irrelevant for this question.
Hope this helps.
