1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
goldfiish [28.3K]
3 years ago
13

Which of these is a demographic shift that has resulted from China is one child policy?

History
1 answer:
e-lub [12.9K]3 years ago
4 0
The answer would be Shrinking Population
You might be interested in
Why did so many civil war battles took place in Virginia?
Vaselesa [24]
Many Civil War battles happened to take place in Virginia because this state happened to be located fairly in the middle of the North and South regions.
8 0
4 years ago
In at least 150 words, discuss how access to electronic devices and media has altered the election process. You may discuss a sp
Gelneren [198K]

Answer:Electronis and social media has affected are lives in many ways some good and some bad they even affect elections heres how.

The Spread of Information

This is the biggest impact social media has on elections the spread of information  Today, virtually every piece of information known to man is available literally at our finger tips.

Another way social media affects elections is a big thing called debates in the past, debates were somewhat downplayed, and people thought that it ultimately could not sway the results of an election. Many people thought that while opinion may change slightly, it wouldn’t affect the outcome of the election unless one candidate flat-out humiliated or dominated the other one. Then, of course word would spread.

A Very big one is gossip gossip effects elections in many ways for example hillary clinton and the email scandol which more over caused her to lose the election gossip has a big affect on who is more popular and who will get the vote.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
how were the rights granted to slaves in west Africa cultures different from the rights of slaves in the Atlantic slave trade
ICE Princess25 [194]

____________________________________________________

Answer:

Your answer would be "In West African cultures, slaves were allowed to own slaves of their own, while those in the Atlantic Slave trade were and this was a right granted to slaves in West African cultures."

____________________________________________________

The rights granted to slaves in West Africa cultures  were different from the rights of slaves in the Atlantic slave trade was because in West African cultures, slaves were allowed to own slaves of their own, while those in the Atlantic Slave trade were and this was a right granted to slaves in West African cultures.

____________________________________________________

Definitions:

West Africa cultures:

West Africa cultures were cultures that came from the Western region of Africa, typically talking about places like Ghana, Guinea, Mali, and etc.

Atlantic slave trade:

The Atlantic slave trade was a time where African people were enslaved and transported to the Americas. This is one of the ways the Americas got their slaves. This occurred around the 16th to 19th century.

____________________________________________________

Explanation:

The reason why "In West African cultures, slaves were allowed to own slaves of their own, while those in the Atlantic Slave trade were and this was a right granted to slaves in West African cultures" would be the correct answer is because in the West African culture, slaves were allowed to own their own slaves. It's pretty much saying, a slave could own a slave, and that chain could possibly keep on going. In the West African culture, you can see a lot of slaves that own slaves themselves, and it is just a normal thing in their culture.

The slaves in the Atlantic slave trade did not have any rights like the slaves in West Africa. The slaves that were apart of the Atlantic slave trade had no power at all, the only people that could control them were their owners, in other words, the people in the America's. They also had no right to own their own slaves while being slaves themselves, it didn't work that way for them. They were only owned by their owners and that was it, they had no property to themselves, unless they escaped from their owners to a free state.

____________________________________________________

Why the other answer choices are incorrect;

Answer choice "In West African cultures, slaves were not allowed to keep their names, while those in the Atlantic slave trade were." is incorrect because:

Slaves in West African Culture could keep their names, since the slave owners in their culture really didn't care about their names anyways. Slaves that were apart of the Atlantic slave trade were given slaves names, and didn't have no right to name themselves. This is the reason why this answer choice would be eliminated.

Answer choice "In West African cultures, slaves were not allowed to wear clothes, while those in the Atlantic slave trade were." is incorrect because:

Slaves in West Africa were allowed to wear clothes while they were in duty of their owners. Same thing in the African Slave Trade, they were also allowed to some clothes, that meaning that they were only wearing a small amount of clothing, keeping their privates not exposed. This is the reason why this answer choice would be eliminated.

Answer choice "In West African cultures, slaves were allowed to eat with their masters, while those in the Atlantic slave trade were not" is incorrect because:

Slaves that were in West Africa usually didn't eat with their masters, and that was something that they had to go through while being a slave. As a slave, they usually ate by themselves, and their masters usually give them barely anything. Same thing goes to the slaves in the Atlantic slave trade, they were not allowed to eat with their masters, they ate by themselves. This is the reason why this answer choice would be eliminated.

____________________________________________________

-Julie

7 0
3 years ago
1) why was d-day significant in ending the war in europe during WWII (include dates, names, death count, did it change the cours
Reptile [31]
1. The D-Day landings broke the Atlantic wall which was thought to be unbreakable and allowed the Allies to successfully complete the liberation of Western Europe. After the victory in Normandy, Paris was liberated in August 1944 as the Allies pushed slowly eastward and the Soviet Union moved toward Berlin as well.
2. The D-Day invasion is significant in history for the role it played in World War II. D-Day marked the turn of the tide for the control maintained by Nazi Germany; less than a year after the invasion, the Allies formally accepted Nazi Germany's surrender.
3 0
2 years ago
Help me with this please. I’ll give brainliest . No links
gulaghasi [49]

Answer:

its a civil, aka letter d or the 4th ome

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • L 2.3.5 Quiz: Social Changes
    12·1 answer
  • Why is John Marshall important to American judicial history?
    8·2 answers
  • What is society ?what is community ?<br><br>​
    6·2 answers
  • I’m late summer of 1781 Washington’s troops trapped Cornwallis’s army at _____?
    6·2 answers
  • Why Charles Babbage is known as the 'father of modern computer'?​
    5·2 answers
  • The Treaty of Versailles, which ended World War I, negatively impacted which country’s economy the most?
    7·1 answer
  • When did General Granger arrive in Galveston, Texas, to read the Emancipation Proclamation?
    10·2 answers
  • Why did so many Native Americans die during the colonial period? What effect did this have on the slave trade?
    11·1 answer
  • Why did World War I become such an extensive war? (Choose 3)
    12·1 answer
  • Hi URGENT NEED HELP I will give Brainly and 100 points for all 5 questions.
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!