Answer:
when it was part of the Texas black history and they still had them divided the white people and the black people and the white people had stuff that the black people didn't and they had better rights than the other. they had to be separated for everything because they didn't have the same color skin and that they didn't like that kind of person that they were.The people was also cruel at that time because some of them were slaves from the white people and then having to separate them that is too much for them because they had to work a lot and sometimes they didn't pay them but peoples life changed a lot when everything was over thanks to Abraham Lincoln.some difference of this picture is that the white people had always the better things and that the black people didn't and the black people and the white people could not do something that a white person could do.
Explanation:
The correct answer for the question that is being presented above is this one: (1) he upheld the general use of nonviolent civil disobeyed against unjust laws and (2) saying human rights must take precedence over such laws. If King admits that breaking laws in order to change them is "a legitimate concern," then here are the two reasons for his defense of civil disobedience (1) h<span>e upheld the general use of nonviolent civil disobeyed against unjust laws and (2) saying human rights must take precedence over such laws.</span>
