Answer:
c. “You never listen to me.”
Hello. You have not informed which book reviews this question is referring to. This makes it impossible for me to answer you specifically. However, I will try to help you as much as I can, giving instructions on how to answer this.
You should read both reviews and observe the position of the review author in relation to the book. It is likely that each author makes different positions on the construction of the narratives, the characters, the writing style, the events, the themes and other elements of the work. These positions can be positive, when they praise the work, or, negative, when they criticize the work. You must identify which author is being positive and which is being negative.
Conspiracy theories were always irrational ideas without evidence that’s what a “theory” is so if you have proof you have to have the dates, witnesses, because anyone can fake a video or picture with the help of video editing. Though many people use the term debunk to infer that they have falsified an idea, over the years, it has become less rational an endeavor. Today many debunkers are actually pseudo-skeptics. Instead of considering an idea and trying to falsify it, many debunkers just assume science is on their side and instead try to a priori dismiss the idea, and worse to discredit the person who proposes the idea. That is not rational skepticism or critical thinking. Debunking isn’t always falsification or refutation but as often as not just name-calling and denial.
Answer
Since anything can be called a conspiracy theory, and since debunking can be achieved by put-downs and shaming; any idea you don’t like, you call a conspiracy theory and its proponent a conspiracist, and then contemptuously mock the idea and the person who advocates it. Easy-peezy-debunky-sleazy.
88 views
2
Related Questions (More Answers Below)
The correct answer is 4. It supports the overall organization of the speech by building an argument for a particular solution.
Explanation
The text presents a proposal to unify the celebration of junior and senior promotion. In this text, the author compares and contrasts both celebrations, indeed, the author exposes the minimum differences between both celebrations, for example in the junior the attire is semi-formal and the attendees are junior, while in the senior, the attire is formal and the attendees are senior. Moreover, the author explains the characteristics of both celebrations are very similar. From the differences and similarities an argument is built in which it is exposed why it would be better to unify them to reduce the costs of implementation and allow more people to attend it by reducing the income value. According to the above, the correct answer is 4. It supports the overall organization of speech by building an argument for a particular solution.
