All categories

3 years ago

HELPPPPPPPPPPP AGAIN IM BEING TIMED AND IM FAILING THIS CLASS

English

2 answers:

malfutka [58]3 years ago

7 0

Answer:

1rst person is seeing a person through the characters eyes

2nd is the 6th answer

Explanation:

Where is the 2nd person and 3rd person answers

svet-max [94.6K]3 years ago

4 0

Answer: first person-- 3rd option

second person-- 4th option

third person-- 5th option

Explanation:

You might be interested in

Read the passage then answer the question. “The poppies bobbed their heads like helmeted soldiers in formation.” What type of la

Kruka [31]

It's certainly sensory. And it's figurative too. I think I'd pick figurative because the central piece of language is a simile. That's pretty good use of language when you compare the bobbing heads of flowers to helmeted soldiers.

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Is graffiti considered a deferral crime or artwork

frosja888 [35]

Answer:

A crime.

Explanation:

Yes, graffiti is in some ways creative and some graffiti works are great, but it is illegal to mark property that isn't in your possession.

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Based on the Venn diagram, which statements could accurately be used within a compare-and-contrast paragraph about farmers and v

SVETLANKA909090 [29]

Answer:

A. a lot of travel is not typically required for a farmer; similarly, a lot of traveling for work is not generally required of veterinarians.

C. Veterinarians and farmers both work with animals, although in different ways.

D. Job opportunities for farmers are declining, while job opportunities for veterinarians are rising.

Explanation:

In a Venn diagram, two circles denote two sets of information, with different characteristics. Their area of intersection, however, represents the qualities that they both share, or their common grounds.

Based on this it can be said that the farmers and veterinarians share two common grounds - "work and care for animals" and "very little travel involved." The latter makes option A correct.

The correctness of option C (Veterinarians and farmers both work with animals, although in different ways) is because of two reasons: according to the Venn diagram, they both share "work and care for animals," but, each of them also have different characteristics of work mentioned as "produce crops and dairy products" for the farmers and "often work in private clinics" for the veterinarians, which also makes their work different.

It can be seen from the uncommon zones of the circles that for the farmers, the job opportunities are declining, while they are rising in case of the veterinarians, which proves the correctness of option D.

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

The _____ engine kept stalling. negligible fractious dull thrust

photoshop1234 [79]

The dull engine kept stalling.

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which details support the central idea that information on the Internet is not protected well enough? Check all that apply. “onl

lutik1710 [3]

The correct answers are "Only a small fraction is securely encrypted; the remainder is poorly encrypted" and "Anybody can get their hands on more information".

It is true that not all of the internet traffic is protected. About 60% of this traffic is encrypted; the rest remains a work in progress. This puts uncovered information at the risk of getting collected by able computer security technicians.

With the increasing availability of tools to simulate firewall security breaches, free to download from the internet, anybody who takes the time to learn these practices is capable of compromising unencrypted information - or even encrypted, depending on their skill.

The other options are not to be considered supportive of the central idea since:

The quantity of internet users is irrelevant to the fact that whether the current amount of information is at risk or not. The precautions these users take when browsing the web however, are a more contributing fact to the idea.
Most people do not take adequate precautions when it comes to their privacy, evidence being that the amount of personal data submitted to social networks allows their administrators to take advantage of it, selling the information to advertisers and ensuring a multi-millionaire income.

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers