Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Let x represent the amount invested at 6%. Then the amount invested at 12% is 4x+249. Sherrie's interest is ...
0.06x +0.12(4x +249) = 988.92
0.54x + 29.88 = 988.92
0.54x = 959.04
x = 959.04/0.54 = 1776
4x+249 = 7353
__
Sherrie invested $1776 at 6% and $7353 at 12%.
The minimum distance is the perpendicular distance. So establish the distance from the origin to the line using the distance formula.
The distance here is: <span><span>d2</span>=(x−0<span>)^2</span>+(y−0<span>)^2
</span> =<span>x^2</span>+<span>y^2
</span></span>
To minimize this function d^2 subject to the constraint, <span>2x+y−10=0
</span>If we substitute, the y-values the distance function can take will be related to the x-values by the line:<span>y=10−2x
</span>You can substitute this in for y in the distance function and take the derivative:
<span>d=sqrt [<span><span><span>x2</span>+(10−2x<span>)^2]
</span></span></span></span>
d′=1/2 (5x2−40x+100)^(−1/2) (10x−40)<span>
</span>Setting the derivative to zero to find optimal x,
<span><span>d′</span>=0→10x−40=0→x=4
</span>
This will be the x-value on the line such that the distance between the origin and line will be EITHER a maximum or minimum (technically, it should be checked afterward).
For x = 4, the corresponding y-value is found from the equation of the line (since we need the corresponding y-value on the line for this x-value).
Then y = 10 - 2(4) = 2.
So the point, P, is (4,2).
the 3rd one. hope this helps
Answer:
a) Null and alternative hypothesis:

b) A Type I error is made when a true null hypothesis is rejected. In this case, it would mean a conclusion that the proportion is significantly bigger than 10%, when in fact it is not.
c) The consequences would be that they would be more optimistic than they should about the result of the investment, expecting a proportion of students that is bigger than the true population proportion.
d) A Type II error is made when a false null hypothesis is failed to be rejected. This would mean that, although the proportion is significantly bigger than 10%, there is no enough evidence and it is concluded erroneously that the proportion is not significantly bigger than 10%
e) The consequences would be that the investment may not be made, even when the results would have been more positive than expected from the conclusion of the hypothesis test.
Step-by-step explanation:
a) The hypothesis should be carried to test if the proportion of students that would eat there at least once a week is significantly higher than 10%.
Then, the alternative or spectulative hypothesis will state this claim: that the population proportion is significantly bigger than 10%.
On the contrary, the null hypothesis will state that this proportion is not significantly higher than 10%.
This can be written as:

Six hundred seventy-two thousandths <0.8