Napoleon Bonaparte had a contradictory character. He had an unusual personality. The writer Germaine de Staël described him as being ‘neither good nor violent, neither gentle nor cruel’, which denotes that he was <em>neutral</em>, a<em> calm </em>and <em>calculated/prudent </em>person. he was considered<em> unique </em>and <em>very special </em>for the actions he took and the thinking he put into taking decisions. By the French writer Stendhal, he was seen as <em>very </em><span><em>ambitious</em> (''endowed with amazing abilities and a dangerous ambition’'). He was very <em>firm</em> when it was about facing his <span>opponents. Even more, he could get even mad when his passions had to face disputes. He was a very difficult person, but that made him more <em>powerful </em>than the others. Also, it is said that ''his diversity (<em>diverse</em>) made him <em>fascinating''</em>. He was hostile to his older brother. He had a military, legislative and <span>diplomatic talent. |He was<em> popular</em>, but his more of defects were: picky (<span>squeamish), selfish, egocentric.</span></span></span></span>
Answer:
b) berries, nuts, and small animals
Explanation:
It says that the Australians used to eat ants, grubs, moths, and beetles back in the day. Along with the berries and nuts.
Answer:
Daoists believed people should renounce wealth, power and ambition. They also rejected social structures, and formal codes of behavior. Daosits believed people should attune themselves to nature and the Dao, which is the eternal force that permeates everything in nature. Daoists opposed conflict and strife.
I think is president lyndon B. johnson because he fear that he not make it and that scare him alot... abit
