Take notes as you study.
Always re-read anything that seems to confuse you at all.
Think about the end points and the start points of anything you're trying to learn. (Helps with memorizing)
~mathnerdz
According to the text "Evaluating a Case Study: Developing a Practical Ethical Viewpoint," Ms. Smith, Mrs. Taylor and Mr. Jones cannot agree on who deserves to win a prize for outstanding moral behaviour. The candidates are Mr. Big and Mrs. Little. The main ethical concerns are: whether one big, good act counts more than many small good acts; whether benefitting one person greatly is better than benefitting many in small ways; and whether a good act that does not benefit the actor is better than an act that does benefit him.
The approach that I would use is utilitarianism. According to this approach, the "most" moral act is the one that contributes to the greater happiness of a greater number of people. According to this idea, Mr. Big would win the award. This is because Mr. Big saved a man from drowning. However, this man was an important businessman, which means that Mr. Big also saved all of the man's employees from having to face unemployment. He benefitted the largest number of people.
NOTE some key features of theories that are important to understand from this description:
Answer:
B. Theories aren't likely to change. They have so much support and are able to explain satisfactorily so many observations, that they are not likely to change. Theories can, indeed, be facts. Theories can change, but it is a long and difficult process. In order for a theory to change, there must be many observations or evidence that the theory cannot explain.
Explanation:
From the passage or description of the word scientific theory, it was concluded that:
1. Theory is a scientific explanations, well defined or established that now new evidence will change them
2. Theory may change or their interpretation may change, but not the facts that are well determined in the theory.
3. Theory can be used to predict unobserved situation or phenomenon based on the facts well established by the theory.
4. Theory in scientific terms is different from general usage of the term.
As theory in science explaexplainsin well defined facts, while the general usage are often times mean hunch or speculation.
Answer:
Employer-Employee relationship
Explanation:
This scenario shows the existing relationship between Xanat and Humberto, her supervisor.
Humberto notices Xanat's decline in work performance levels and calls her for a meeting where it is discovered that her recent bad performances at work is related to the grief she is facing as a result of her mother's death.
Humberto understands her grief and instead of threatening her with pay cuts or sacking, he recommends she visit the company's Employee Assistance Program so she can get over her grief quicker and return to work.
This shows quite clearly the good working relationship between Employee and Employer. In another scenario, with another supervisor, Xanat may have been fined or talked to harshly but because of the working relationship her supervisor Humberto understood her grief and gave her time to recover and a place to do so.
The line from this passage that supports the idea that the Greeks believed that gods were responsible for the weather is: A) “At dawn, Circe sent a favorable wind to take them on their way.”
In this excerpt from the passage, we find that the Greeks believed in the ability of Circe who was one of the Greek gods to control their weather.
The belief as illustrated in these words is that Circe could send a favorable wind that will guide the sailors in their activities.
So, sentence A is correct about the Greek's belief in the abilities of the gods to control the wind.
Learn more about Odysseus here:
brainly.com/question/1904705
