Answer:
True
Explanation:
Sociology can be defined as a social science that deals with the study of the socio-cultural interaction of humans with respect to the structure, functioning and development of their society.
The main purpose of sociology is to develop and enhance human knowledge or understanding of important socio-cultural processes through the gathering and analysis of all aspects of the social life of the people living in a society.
A sociologist refers to an individual (scientist) that studies sociology i.e a social scientist.
Generally, sociologists are saddled with the responsibility of studying different categories of people and the societal problems that affect them.
This ultimately implies that, sociologists study how society affects a group of people and how the people affect the society in return.
Prejudice can be defined as a negative or positive assumption (evaluation) about someone based on his or her membership to a social group, especially by considering the following factors; race, gender, ethnicity, class, ability, sexual orientation, religion, political interest, etc. Thus, prejudice is averse to critical thinking, knowledge and reasoning with respect to making an objective thought or consideration about a social group.
Generally, this category exercise their power on a social group based on their membership to a particular social group.
This ultimately implies that, prejudice involves the exercise of power and actions that are devoid of objectivity.
Answer:
A thing is a thing
Explanation:
A thing is a thing because it is a thing
The correct answer is: frontier farming became easier because there were new tools that helped break the soil faster. However, even though there were many useful tools for farming, it was also difficult for people to get a job since the machines were taking their places.
For example, there were new machines such as farming with windmills, steel plows and reaping machines which made harvesting quick and easy.
Nevertheless, it was hard for farmers to pay for these tools and put them in debts. They dealt with economic problems as crop prices dropped and their debts grew.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached we can say the following.
No. The House Committee on Un-American Activities (HUAC) and senator McCarthywere not justified in investigating people who were suspected of being communists.
What Senator McCarthy basically did was to accuse many members of the United States federal government and the US military, but he never showed any valid evic¿dence that supported his accusations.
We are referring to Wisconsin Republican Senator Joseph McCarthy who accused many that many people of supporting Communist activities in the mid-1950s. McCarthy just accused people but never offer a serious argument or proof, so he ended up being a liar and his political career ended.
It is good to have because they may be losing in votes but they have to be determined to win and keep trying and pushing to try and win. they can't just give up and let the other person win or they would lose everything that they have just worked for.