Explanation:
- Adapting to a new job
- Adaptation in a new city
- Adaptation in college
1- Adapting to a new job can be a challenging experience for most people, due to the insecurity of dealing with a new environment where they will have new processes and rules, in addition to co-workers with whom you will have to live daily. So it is important to be open to the learning that a new job will have, having responsibility to deal with the rules, being friendly to people, willing to learn and to help. Being an ethical person is already the principle for adaptation to occur organically and effectively.
2- Adapting to a new city is an experience that can be more complex depending on the old city in which you lived, if it was a large city and you moved to a city in the countryside, the adaptation will probably be longer and more difficult.
However, it is essential to seek to meet other people, discover the strengths of the city and be open to live new memories and experiences.
3- Adapting to college is something that most young people will go through, usually this is a faster adaptation process, since there are many people in the same situation as you, which can mean more direct and open contact with people.
<u>Answer:</u>
The purpose of analyzing a play is (B) to offer a specific interpretation of the play
.
<u>Explanation:</u>
Whenever someone analyses a play, it means he is trying to understand the message of the author better. The person is trying to understand the characters deeply and the style of the writing of the play is also analysed. So, option B is correct.
Option A is incorrect as one doesn’t summarize a play’s plot or story while analysing it. Neither the person tries to understand the geographical setting of the play, as per option C. Option D is incorrect as well as analysing is not providing description of the scenes of the play.
<h3><em>Read the excerpt from “Acres of Diamonds,” a speech given by Russell H. Conwell at a graduation ceremony at Temple University. Then answer the question. </em></h3><h3><em>1. What is the speaker’s purpose and viewpoint in “Acres of Diamonds”? How does the speaker use rhetoric to advance his purpose and clearly convey his viewpoint? </em></h3><h3><em>Answer:
</em></h3><h3><em>The speaker’s purpose and viewpoint in Acres of Diamonds is to convey the idea that everyone in Philadelphia can get rich by finding diamonds, but first they have to convince themselves that they can really find diamonds. Russell H. Conwell tries to advance his purpose and clearly convey his viewpoint by saying that the people of Philadelphia has many prejudices that does not allow them to see the truth for progressing economically. In addition, he appeals to the younger people of Philadelphia saying that they have not grown up with customs that cannot let them grow believing that there can be a change in their economic lives. </em></h3><h3><em>2. What is the main argument of the passage? What claims does the author make to support the argument? How valid, relevant, and sufficient is the reasoning and evidence used to support the argument and claims? Does the author use false statements or fallacious reasoning to support the argument and claims? </em></h3><h3><em>Answer:
</em></h3><h3><em>The main argument of the passage is that Philadelphia people can now be rich “within the reach of almost every man and woman”. The reasoning and evidence he uses to support the argument he claims is valid, relevant, and sufficient. First, he appeals to evidence mentioning that a young man found a diamond in North Carolina, appealing to the people common sense of believing that if a young man could find a diamond, anyone can do it. Furthermore, he appeals to an expert voice, a distinguished professor in mineralogy to ask him about where those diamonds came from. The professor assured Conwell that in Philadelphia there is one of the greatest diamond-mines in the world.
</em></h3><h3><em>The author uses true and false statements to support his arguments and claims. He mentions that he has been told all his life that if a person has money, it is because he or she is dishonest. This truth has two sides, one that really shows the ugly truth of many people getting rich dishonestly, and the other saying that all rich people are honest. Conwell mistakenly says that the foundation of Philadelphia people is false, and that all rich people are honest, a false argument that excuses him for his eagerness to convince people of Philadelphia to get rich. </em></h3><h3><em>
</em></h3>
Answer: i believe the answer is D.the tragic heroine
Explanation: im on engenuity right now too...lol
