The answer would most likely be a metaphor, sorry if I’m wrong!
The argument relies on claims that are not backed up by facts
Explanation:
Your mum will be really pleased if you give her flowers. She <u>will</u><u> </u><u>love</u> flowers.
<em><u>Hope</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>this</u></em><em><u> helps</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>you</u></em>
<em><u>Have</u></em><em><u> a</u></em><em><u> nice</u></em><em><u> day</u></em>
It seems that you missed the given choices of the question above which are the following:
A. the past is not something we can talk about.
B. there are no words to convey the pain of the past.
C. The battle of the sexes will go on forever.<span>
D. Men’s and women’s roles are deeply rooted in our species.
Anyway, the correct answer for the given question above would be option D. When the </span><span>author says in lines 40–41 that “I'm convinced the past, we must contend with is deeper even than speech,” he means that </span>Men’s and women’s roles are deeply rooted in our species. Hope this answer helps.
“Let us learn to show our friendship for a man when he is alive and not after he is dead... After that my own rule is to let everything alone.”
Meyer Wolfsheim
