Answer:
Yes, the United States demonstrated that they were a competitive World Power at the conclusion of World War I.
Explanation:
World War I brought changes not only in the world but in the United States as well. A country not older in politics than other political giants such as Europe, was able to work on global stage like no one imagined.
The United States, under Woodrow's Presidentship played US neutrality until when Germans dashed RMS Lusitania, the British ocena liner, which contained hunderds of Americans on the ship. Germany's repetitive acttions made America to declare war with Germany. This action changed the course of the United States and President Wilson's advocacy for the League of Nations brought recognition to the US as a competitive World Power at the conclusion of WWI.
Answer:
Japan-United this Axis coalition with Germany and Italy in 1940. The totalitarian government of premier Tojo Hideki approved the gas fire on the US Navy support in Pearl Harbor in 1941, which indicated the beginning of the ocean War (1941-45 ). This royal army was up with intrusions of the ocean islands and most of South-East Asia at the quest of its so-called Greater Asian Prosperity region. Fighter pilots, Zero champions, Iwo Jima, construction on the River Kwai-there are some intriguing names and pictures linked with Japan and the world war ii. Like never in the past, Japan had been subdued.
Pie
is your ANSWER or god god is always the right answer
Your answer would be A) How the slave population would be counted. During the time, there was a big debate on whether or not the slaves in the U.S should be counted towards the whole population of the United States when it comes to voting. People wanted a proper number, or representation, of the amount of people in the U.S that voted. The free men that lived in the U.S has every right to vote, but whenever a Slave votes, their votes would count as only 3/5 of a person. That's where the three-fifths compromise comes from, it decided that slaves could only be 3/5 of a person, meaning that their vote will count as 3/5, but not 1 whole. This means that the slaves who vote don't represent a whole person, and is only partially voting. This made the voting numbers very difficult and inaccurate because a person who's voting can't be only 3/5 of a person. In order for the votes to be more accurate, people believed that everyone, even slaves, should be one whole vote, not 3/5 of a vote.
