Abortion is a grim thing to do, but it may be important in some cases. Foe example, if the fetus taking a deathly toll on the mothers body, and is killing both of them, in order to save them, it would be smarter to have an abortion. This can be compared to The Trolley problem, kill one to save more people. It would be better to abort a fetus, them have the fetus and the mother die. Another example is if the mother is a victim of sexual assault, and the pregnancy would be a painful reminder of the incident, therefore in some cases, causing the mother to have hatred or resentment towards the child. My last argument would be if the child has a disease that could greatly affect his or her life, such as cerebral palsy, which causes immobility of the muscles and bones. If the parent does not wish to bring a life of being completely immobile and unable to live a normal life, or simply does not have the financial means to care for the child properly, an abortion may be considered.
I hope some of these help, I know this is a sensitive topic, and a lot of people are not comfortable with it, but it needs to be said. You are brave asking for help. Hope this helps!
Hello
Answer: C. After James got off his horse, he removed the saddle.
Explanation: this is a subordinated clause. The subordination is giving by the subordinate conjunction "after"; thence, we hope to find 2 parts in the sentence and in past. Therefore, options A and B would not work as they are not using any past. However, in option D, we have first simple past (preterite) and then past perfect, and this is not logically right because of the use of after in the sentence. In this sense, the only correct answer is C. After James got off his horse, he removed the saddle. Simple past + simple past.
Hope this helps.
