C) The burglars were politics related. I didn't read the article, but this is probably most related to Nixon's Watergate scandal.
A is incorrect because they are anti-communist, so wouldn't support Cuba.
B is a logical fallacy and completely unrelated to the article.
D is wrong for obvious reasons: teamwork isn't the main idea of the article.
a statement summarizing Smith's claim examples of Smith's reasoning and evidence an evaluation of Smith's reasoning and evidence a sentence introducing the topic of the argument a conclusion summarizing the claim and evaluation.
A statement summarizing Smith's claim
Examples of Smith's reasoning and evidence.
Answer: Options A and B.
<u>Explanation:</u>
Indeed, the statement summarizing Smith’s claim provides the reader with all the essential information about it since not only it includes the claim but the conclusion since such is already present in the claim.
Additionally, using examples of her reasoning and evidence allows the reader to form his own informed opinion in light of the empirical and factual evidence which supports the claim. The effect of such evidence is that the claim becomes credible because it is supported by documented data that can be analyzed by the reader himself to arrive to a conclusion.
The answer is B you want the supporting details to help support your main idea not introduce it
Here are some examples:
-the stress of being someone they're not
-social media getting in their way
-peer pressure
-culture being dissed upon
<span>A.
They remind him of a happier, more humane past.</span>
