1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
enyata [817]
3 years ago
14

Why did so many people invest in the stock market 1920s

History
1 answer:
Jobisdone [24]3 years ago
8 0

A lot of people invested in the stock market in the 1920s because they could buy stocks 'on the margin', and hence, required little initial capital. 'Buying on margin' means that you leverage an asset by borrowing money from a lender.


You might be interested in
The Federalists and Anti-Federalists argued primarily over which issue?
algol13
B. Fair state representation in the national Congress
7 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
When Germany learned that the United States was sending supplies to Great Britain, they sent uboats, or submarines, to patrol th
zubka84 [21]

Answer:alantic ocean

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
What good intentions might the government officials have had in implementing the policy of Americanization?
ehidna [41]

Hello. Here's your answer.

"The Commission supports effective Americanization of new immigrants, that is the cultivation of a shared commitment to the American values of liberty, democracy, and equal opportunity. The United States is one of the most successful multiethnic nations in history. It has united immigrants and their descendants from all over the world around a commitment to democratic ideals and constitutional principles. Those ideals and principles have been embraced by persons from an extraordinary variety of religious and ethnic backgrounds, partly because they permit and protect religious and cultural diversity within a framework of national political unity."

Hope this helped!

-Edge

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The Constitution gives the federal goverment many important duties: making laws, raising money and deciding how to
Mama L [17]

Answer:

National defense is the priority job of the national government.

National defense is the only mandatory function of the national government. Most of the powers granted to Congress are permissive in nature. Congress is given certain authorities but not required by the Constitution to exercise them. For example, Article One, Section Eight gives Congress power to pass a bankruptcy code, but Congress actually did not enact bankruptcy laws until well into the 19th century.

But the Constitution does require the federal government to protect the nation. Article Four, Section Four states that the “United States shall guarantee to every State a republican form of government and shall protect each of them against invasion.” In other words, even if the federal government chose to exercise no other power, it must, under the Constitution, provide for the common defense.

National defense is exclusively the function of the national government. Under our Constitution, the states are generally sovereign, which means that the legitimate functions of government not specifically granted to the federal government are reserved to the states. But Article One, Section 10 does specifically prohibit the states, except with the consent of Congress, from keeping troops or warships in time of peace or engaging in war, the only exception being that states may act on their own if actually invaded. (This was necessary because, when the Constitution was written, primitive forms of communication and transportation meant that it could take weeks before Washington was even notified of an invasion.)

The great irony of our time is that the bigger the federal government has become, the less well it has performed its priority function of providing for the national defense. For example, Congress spent $787 billion in the “stimulus” bill last year, yet not a dime of it was spent on military procurement or modernization—despite the fact that America is in greater danger today than it has been at any time since Communism was threatening Europe in the late 1940s.

The Heritage Foundation has written extensively on the risks facing America and the state of our defenses. Here is a brief summary of the salient facts.

America has no strategy for victory in the war on terrorism—we’re not even calling it a war anymore—and the momentum has shifted to the terrorists. The outcome in Afghanistan is in doubt. If the terrorists succeed there, they can reconstitute their safe havens, plan further attacks on the United States, and threaten to gain control of Pakistan’s nuclear arsenal.

The Commission on the Prevention of Weapons of Mass Destruction Proliferation and Terrorism, a bipartisan commission with the status of the 9/11 Commission, found unanimously that the terrorists would “more likely than not” develop and use a weapon of mass destruction against a Western city by 2013. The Director of National Intelligence publicly agreed with that assessment.

The international regime for controlling nuclear weapons is broken. Pakistan has a substantial and growing nuclear arsenal. Its intelligence organization has been penetrated by the Islamists. Both North Korea and Iran are steadily increasing the range, payload, and accuracy of their ballistic missiles. No one seriously believes that the Iranians will voluntarily stop their nuclear program or that the West (except perhaps the Israelis) will use force to stop them.

According to our Pacific commander, China is increasing its military strength far more quickly than our intelligence predicted. The Chinese have already acquired an arsenal of advanced fighters and missiles that threatens to deny the American Navy access to the Taiwan Strait. They are building as many as five submarines per year and have established a modern submarine base on the island of Hainan. They have announced plans to build a variety of the ships necessary to field a blue water capability.  

The American military is significantly weaker than it was at the end of the Cold War.  Most of our tankers are equally as old; they will not be replaced, if at all, until the 2030s. The Department of Defense wants to close our most modern cargo aircraft production line and will close our most sophisticated fighter line. The missile defense budget has been cut, and according to most reports, the Obama Administration will cut modernization budgets even further.

As important as it is for the federal government to restrain itself from interfering where it does not belong, it is equally important that the government perform its constitutionally mandated function of providing for the national defense.

America’s global influence is being checked and rolled back, and even the homeland is no longer safe from attack.

The situation can still be recovered, but only if our leaders understand their duty, regain their confidence, and reenergize the defense of freedom here and abroad.

7 0
3 years ago
Difference between 13th 14th and 15th amendment? please help
Gekata [30.6K]
The 13th amendment abolished slavery, the 14th amendment gave citizenship to anybody born in the U.S., and the 15th amendment gave voting rights to everyone, regardless of race, gender, and ethnicity. How? Well, see below for an explanation!

The 13th Amendment, established completely in December 6, 1865, was an amendment that arguably abolished slavery and any form of involuntary servitude in the United States of America. This occurred under Abraham Lincoln’s administration, and was used as a gradual attempt at slavery vanquishment. The 14th amendment, established completely on July 9, 1868, was a newly ordered conduct allowing anybody citizenship who was born in the U.S.. Similar to the 13th amendment, this was an attempt at more freedom for people living in the U.S.. The 15th amendment, established completely on February 3, 1870, was an amendment in which everybody earned voting rights. This ratification was very crucial to the United States because many people had different opinions and biases on whether certain people should vote. Because the U.S. was very discriminatory at this time not only toward blacks, but toward women as well, this amendment sparked controversy throughout the South and led to gradual secession in states that would later form the Confederate States of America. If you need extra help, let me know and I will gladly assist you.
8 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Explain the impact of American expansionism on Native Americans between 1800 - 1850
    10·2 answers
  • Why does Eugene Skinner want to give up boxing?
    15·1 answer
  • The term “shogun” describes a role in feudal Japan most like what role in feudal Europe?
    10·1 answer
  • Heya message does the narrator communicate by describing the death of his father
    15·1 answer
  • What does Lincoln feel is the purpose of having this cemetery serve as a final resting place?
    5·1 answer
  • Besides defeating the defenders of the Alamo, what did Mexican troops do that inspired cries for revenge?(a short some up)
    13·1 answer
  • Which detail from the text best supports the answer to Part A? For the bill of rights in a changing America
    8·1 answer
  • Explain how Tutankhamun can be identified in the painting, even without the caption.Ay (A), the pharaoh who ruled after the deat
    15·1 answer
  • Which country felt ignored by the european powers?
    15·1 answer
  • In 1768 John Hancock’s ship, Liberty, was seized by the British who claimed it has been used for smuggling. What was an importan
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!