1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Rufina [12.5K]
3 years ago
5

In what way could the battle between grendel and beowulf be seen as an allegory for the battle between the pagans and christiani

ty?
History
1 answer:
bija089 [108]3 years ago
3 0

Grendel is presented in the <em>Beowulf </em>story as an embodiment of ungodly evil, and so in the defeat of Grendel by Beowulf can be seen as an allegory for the battle between good and evil and between Christianity (which was then taking root in England) and paganism.

<em>Beowulf </em>is an old, old story by an unknown Anglo-Saxon poet, written in Old English.  It stems back to around 1000 AD.  By that time, England had become largely Christianized, and so the cultural context of the epic poem would naturally include allusions to Christianity overcoming paganism.  In the story, Grendel and his mother are called "descendants of Cain," a reference to the biblical figure of the first son of Adam and Eve, Cain, who became the world's first murderer and a figure associated with evil and chaos and abandonment of the true God.  Beowulf can be seen as something of a "Savior" to defend what is right and good.

Frederick Klaeberg, in his analysis, <em>Beowulf and the Fight at Finnsburg </em>(1950),  noted that we might recognize features of the Christian Savior, Jesus, in Beowulf, who is depicted as "the destroyer of hellish fiends, the warrior brave and gentle, blameless in thought and deed, the king that dies for his people."

You might be interested in
After the railroads were finished, what did nativists fear the Chinese workers would do?
LekaFEV [45]

Answer:

Take jobs from whites

Explanation:

The growth of immigration led to the emergence of Nativism. Nativism was the term specified to the process of protecting and securing the rights of the natives before immigrants. In the labor movement, Nativism witnessed a command because the native-born Americans had a constant fear that their job would be allotted to the immigrants from the China. The immigrants worked at very low wages and therefore there were high chances that they would be assigned for the job. This was the major fear that the natives witnessed.

8 0
3 years ago
Use RACE to respond. How did the development of the plantation system make institutions such as slavery essential to the Souther
sineoko [7]

Answer:

Slavery was important in the Southern Colonies because.

Explanation:

Slavery was essential to the south because they had a year-long growing season and many crops to harvest. So they bought slaves.

4 0
4 years ago
Located on the Iberian Peninsula
Reptile [31]
The country being described would be "Spain," since this is the only other country the lies on this peninsula besides Portugal, and Spain was one of the dominant forces in New World conquest. 
4 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did Mongol migratory patterns affect their production and distribution?
vagabundo [1.1K]

Answer: Mongols did not necessarily need to expand their territories as much as they did. The pull factor for Mongol imperialism is directly related to the push factors. They may have included climactic and geographic issues impacting the nomadic tribes but most likely were due to the Mongols being enthusiastically militaristic.

3 0
3 years ago
How did the u.s intervene mexico
harkovskaia [24]

Answer:

irst supporting and then repudiating Mexican regimes during the period 1910-1920.[1]

Explanation:

The United States involvement in the Mexican Revolution was varied and seemingly contradictory, first supporting and then repudiating Mexican regimes during the period 1910-1920.[1] For both economic and political reasons, the U.S. government generally supported those who occupied the seats of power, whether they held that power legitimately or not. A clear exception was the French Intervention in Mexico, when the U.S. supported the beleaguered liberal government of Benito Juárez at the time of the American Civil War (1861-1865). Prior to Woodrow Wilson's inauguration on March 4, 1913, the U.S. Government focused on just warning the Mexican military that decisive action from the U.S. military would take place if lives and property of U.S. nationals living in the country were endangered.[2] President William Howard Taft sent more troops to the US-Mexico border but did not allow them to intervene in the conflict,[3][4] a move which Congress opposed.[4] Twice during the Revolution, the U.S. sent troops into Mexico.

7 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • What was an impact of the Kent State shootings?
    7·2 answers
  • What are two Important differenences between the article of confederation and the constitution
    5·1 answer
  • In April of 1968, Martin Luther King Jr. had come to Memphis to speak in support of
    13·1 answer
  • Compare and contrast the ideals of the first political parties
    8·1 answer
  • What were the results of the Spanish reconquista for Muslims and Jews
    10·1 answer
  • compare and contrast why did the countries of South America fall to dictatorships and disorganization while the United States be
    5·1 answer
  • Which is TRUE about the Bill of Rights? *
    12·1 answer
  • How did making Egypt a protectorate fuel<br> nationalist discontent in Egypt?
    9·1 answer
  • Have a full blown political war in the comments.
    12·2 answers
  • What is an example of adults perpetuating gender roles?
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!