1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Katena32 [7]
3 years ago
15

Is this argument for U.S. imperialism just or unjust according to Just War Theory?

History
1 answer:
vova2212 [387]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

D. Many argued that Imperialism went against the Constitution. There was nothing in the Constitution that said what was being done was legal. Nor does it say anything about who or which branch has the power. It also goes against the classic American values. How can we stand for independence and peace if we are forcing people to live like us and do what we tell them to. Explanation:

be more specific w ur question

You might be interested in
What was the main conflict that led to the French and Indian War? A.) competition over land B.) alliances with American Indians
const2013 [10]
A).competition over land - they both wanted the Ohio River Valley
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did housing structures change over time during the Neolithic Revolution?
V125BC [204]

At this time in the Neolithic, c. 7000-6,000 B.C.E., people were often buried under the floors of homes, and in some cases their skulls were removed and covered with plaster in order to create very life-like faces, complete with shells inset for eyes and paint to imitate hair and moustaches.
4 0
3 years ago
Why did Quixote attack the windmill in he field
Flura [38]
He thought it was a giant with long arms
4 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the four planes was hijacked first?
Vinvika [58]
America Airlines flight 77
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
10 pts.<br><br> How did imperialism help give countries a strategic advantage over other countries?
Flauer [41]
Imperialism, although it is bad for the conquered countries and regions, is good for the countries that practice it, and even for those countries conquered to some extent (in terms of technology, development), and obtaining extra resources for conquering peoples. While the imperialist country obtains abundant net resources from other regions, expands its political power and makes its power and its world presence larger, the conquered country can obtain technology and life forms that help it from the conquering country. All the imperialist countries have enjoyed a better quality of life for their population and greater social and technological development, given the advantages of having many more lands, resources and people under their power. But finally, when conquered people fight for their independence, this power becomes to decrease and finally its lost.
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Answers please , because i don't know
    6·1 answer
  • What priest criticized the new deal
    13·1 answer
  • The late 1800s political machines controlled by governments of many cities by
    15·1 answer
  • Which was a common method of slave resistance to enforced labor?
    6·1 answer
  • Which of the following is true of Carter’s attempt to free the hostages in Iran?
    6·2 answers
  • according to evidence found by scientists where did Old Stone Age people travel across open oceans in rafts or canoes?a. from We
    15·2 answers
  • The Spanish recruited thousands of supporters from the people the Aztecs had conquered. A. True B. False.
    11·2 answers
  • Why many european countries develop in a year 1850's??
    5·1 answer
  • Read this excerpt from the 24th amendment
    13·2 answers
  • Why did some American leaders oppose proposals to make Hawai a US
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!