Personally, I don't think so.
Every information we have is by principle, biased. We can never have a full picture on the issue (we don't live long enough to have ALL the information and all the other people's opinions) so this means that we only know a selection of relevant information. This selection biases our perception of the issue: so in this way, I think that we are bound to be at least a little bit biased.
Answer:
Law 148: If a man has married a wife and a disease has seized her, if he is determined to marry a second wife, he shall marry her. He shall not divorce the wife whom the disease has seized.
Rule 149. A State is responsible for violations of international humanitarian law attributable to it, including:
(a) violations committed by its organs, including its armed forces;
(b) violations committed by persons or entities it empowered to exercise elements of governmental authority;
(c) violations committed by persons or groups acting in fact on its instructions, or under its direction or control; and
(d) violations committed by private persons or groups which it acknowledges and adopts as its own conduct.
Explanation:
B) Industrial resources and C) intellectual contributions would be considered an example of a human resource. This is because these are two things which humans can produce, such as working in a factory and helping the production line or producing articles and scholarly articles to further advance their community.
I think it’s the printing revolution over the agricultural revolution