1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Vesnalui [34]
2 years ago
9

Drag each label to the correct location on the image. Not all lables will be used.

Arts
2 answers:
Fantom [35]2 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Explanation:

Don't take the other answer, it's wrong. I just failed the test because of that guy.

Nadusha1986 [10]2 years ago
4 0

Im srry but this is easy like you really dont know what to do

anyways ill still help you

s to the first picture

ec to the first picture

em to the first picture

c to the first picture

pc to the second picture

fs to the second picture

Hope this helps

You might be interested in
A mental repetition of a happy statement is
Leto [7]

Answer:

A because positive Self-talker is a great self-help

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
I want to make this into a wallpaper but it's too plain. what do you think i should do to it?
aliya0001 [1]

Answer:

Add white doodles around the outside

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
When notating music for others to read, composers traditionally have used ____________ words to indicate dynamics?
Rudik [331]
Most musical terms are written in Italian.<span />
6 0
3 years ago
Compare current animation technologies with historical technologies. Briefly describe something that current technology tools ha
antiseptic1488 [7]

Answer:

i'm not so much of an expert but i do know a thing or two. this is not the complete list since i'm not so involved in the actual animation industry and what goes on behind there. i still do animations the historical way for fun. stuff like flipbooks. but here it is

<u>current vs historical comparison</u>

- use of 2d or 3d art/modeling programs to graph movements and do character designs vs having to draw by hand, or mold by hand (clay stop motion etc) for everything

- the use of some modelling programs can automatically graph movements  and you just have to make the character vs draw every frame or mold every fram of movement by hand, frames aren't produced automatically

- though some animators still prefer to use traditional/ historical ways, many are changing to the digital way because computers are a thing vs there's no stuff like computers

- colouring may be done digitally instead vs everything done by hand. this is getting redundant but they really had to do everything without computers

of course, there are more points but i think this is enough already. i recommend watching the asadora called "natsuzora" if you'd like to see historical animation in action. they show a lot about animations in the times with no computers. they show processes and also explain some steps to it. it's really nice!

<u>things that they have in common</u>

- i don't think there is anything else if the question is trying to ask what technologies that developed in the present time have something in common with the old. the whole point of separating current tech with old tech is because there is an upgrade. and the upgrade would not have super clear similarities to the olden. but even with the upgrade. the technology is meant to help with animation.

- like i said before, current tech is an upgrade from the old tech. for example, animation tables that have light at the bottom, currently may be equipped with more advanced functions that didn't exist in the old times

- but humans still need to be in charge of the making of animations. even if you use digital programs, people still have to monitor and make small changes because programs are not 100% perfect on its own. in historical times they did everything haha

<u>difference in tech</u>

- only limited to drawing with pencil on paper in olden times, but now you can also choose to draw with stylus on digital

- no computers, but now there are computers with softwares and stuff that helps with animation

- in current times, you can transfer files with computers and you can work anywhere. it can be transferred to different people at different places, even overseas. the olden times require you to be there

that's all that came up on the top of my head. hope it helped :)

4 0
2 years ago
How the size of the orchestra has changed​
Masja [62]

People have been putting instruments together in various combinations for as long as there have been instruments, thousands and thousands of years. But it wasn't until about the last 400 years that musicians started forming into combinations that turned into the modern orchestra.

In the old days, when musicians got together to play, they used whatever instruments were around. If there were three lute players, a harp, and two flutes, then that's what they used. By the 1500s, the time known as the Renaissance, the word "consort" was used to mean a group of instrumentalists, and sometimes singers too, making music together or "in concert".

Early Renaissance composers usually didn't say what instrument they were writing a part for. They meant for the parts to be played by whatever was around. But around 1600 in Italy, the composer Claudio Monteverdi liked things just so. He knew just what instruments he wanted to accompany his opera Orfeo (1607), and he said exactly what instruments should play: fifteen viols of different sizes; two violins; four flutes, two large and two medium; two oboes, two cornetts (small wooden trumpets), four trumpets, five trombones, a harp, two harpsichords, and three small organs.

You can see that Monteverdi's "Renaissance orchestra" was already starting to look like what we think of as an orchestra: instruments organized into sections; lots of bowed strings; lots of variety. In the next century (up to about 1700, J.S. Bach's time) the orchestra developed still further. The violin family, violin, viola, cello, and bass, replaced the viols, and this new kind of string section became even more central to the Baroque orchestra than the viols had been in the Renaissance. Musical leadership in the Baroque orchestra came from the keyboard instruments, with the harpsichordist, or sometimes the organist, acting as leader. When J.S. Bach worked with an orchestra, he sat at the organ or harpsichord and gave cues from his bench.

In the Baroque era, a musical director occasionally stood and conducted, but not in the way we're used to seeing. Jean-Baptiste Lully, who was in charge of music at the French court in the 1600s, used to pound out the beat for his musicians using a sort of long pole, which he tapped on the floor. But once, he accidentally hit his foot, developed gangrene, and died!

In the next century, the orchestra changed a lot. This takes us up to 1800, Haydn's and Beethoven's time. The strings were more important than ever, and the keyboard instruments had taken a back seat. Composers began to write for the specific instrument they had in mind. This meant knowing each instrument's individual "language" and knowing what kind of music would sound best and play easiest on a particular instrument. Composers also began to be more adventurous about combining instruments to get different sounds and colors.

The first violinist, or concertmaster, led the orchestra's performance from his chair, but sometimes, a music director would lead part of a performance with gestures, using a rolled-up piece of white paper that was easy for the musicians to see. This led to the baton that conductors use today. And early in the 1800s, conductor-composers such as Carl Maria von Weber and Felix Mendelssohn actually began to stand up on a podium and conduct from front and center

As orchestras were getting bigger and bigger, all those musicians couldn't see and follow the concertmaster.

Later in the 1800s, the orchestra reached the size and proportions we know today and even went beyond that size. Some composers, such as Berlioz, really went all-out writing for huge orchestras. Instrument design and construction got better and better, making new instruments such as the piccolo and the tuba available for orchestras. Many composers, including Berlioz, Verdi, Wagner, Mahler, and Richard Strauss, became conductors. Their experiments with orchestration showed the way to the 20th century. Wagner went so far as to have a new instrument, the Wagner Tuba, designed and built to make certain special sounds in his opera orchestra. In one of his symphonies, Strauss wrote a part for an alphorn, a wooden folk instrument up to 12 feet long! (The alphorn part is usually played by a tuba.) And Arnold Schoenberg wrote a piece called Gurrelieder for a 150-piece orchestra!

8 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • When heathcliff opens the window on his last night of life, it is a symbol that he wants to?​
    8·1 answer
  • Explain how fresco paintings are created. What are advantages and/or disadvantages of fresco?
    15·2 answers
  • What is silk screen?
    13·2 answers
  • Who is Carson Lueders?
    11·1 answer
  • Anyone plz .........
    10·2 answers
  • HOLD UP WAIT A MINUTE&lt; YA'LL THOUGHT I WAS FINISHED ??<br> What song ?
    7·2 answers
  • NEED ASAP
    14·2 answers
  • Which of the fallowing is not true about mise en place?
    13·1 answer
  • Pls help :))
    12·1 answer
  • alright so i have this class that asks about mental health and about nourishing your feelings/ like a psychology class almost, a
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!