Answer:
Historical evidence shows that tariffs raise prices and reduce available quantities of goods and services for U.S. businesses and consumers, which results in lower income, reduced employment, and lower economic output. Tariffs could reduce U.S. output through a few channels.
Explanation:
The 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, ratified in 1868, granted citizenship to all persons born or naturalized in the United States—including former enslaved people—and guaranteed all citizens “equal protection of the laws.” One of three amendments passed during the Reconstruction era to abolish slavery and establish civil and legal rights for Black Americans, it would become the basis for many landmark Supreme Court decisions over the years.
conclusion :- No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws
If there's a fire in Ninth, Tenth, or Eleventh Street, for example, any hour of the day or night, I'm usually there . . . . If a family is burned out I don't ask them whether they are Republicans or Democrats and I don't refer them to the Charity Organization Society, which would investigate their case in a month or two and would decide they were worthy of help about the time they are dead from starvation. I just get [a place to live] for them, buy clothes for them . . . and fix them up till they get things runnin' again."
Answer:
Their political loyalty
Explanation:
George Washington Plunkitt was a politician known for his membership and a leader of the Tammany Hall political organization. He was also known for his time and exploits at the New York state legislatures. In his Series of Very Plain Talks on Very Practical Politics, George Washington Plunkitt specifically made the above statement in the hope to get the political loyalty of people.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Without a doubt, the effects of the act on Native American history over the course of the twentieth century left the Native Indians divided, hurt, and without their lands.
The Dawes General Allotment Act of 1887 was one of the major pieces of legislation in Native American history. The Act granted the power to the federal government of the United States to split the land and divide it into individual plots so people could get the land and make it work. If a Native American Indian wanted to be considered a United States citizen, it had to accept the Act.
This piece of legislation was another try to change the Indian's culture and habits, to destroy their traditions, and getting them to assume the white American culture.
This was another episode of the complicated and conflictive relationships between white colonists and Native American tribes, that started the moment colonists arrived in the Americas and founded colonies.
White people always wanted more land to settle in and exploit the resources for a big profit.
Native Indians always believed that the land belonged to them and had been inherited by their ancestors.
