Answer:
The correct response is Option C. The article may not reflect current knowledge.
Explanation:
This article that was published by Rick Potts would be considered dated in the field of physical anthropology because it was published more than 20 years ago. In scholarly research, it is important to use articles that are recent and relevant to current advances in the field. Given that new finds in the fossil record and advances in dating techniques have improved, there are many new findings and theories being advanced. An article from 1998 would be missing many of those new insights. You would use this article perhaps in a literature review if it was influential and you were trying to give an intellectual history of the field.
I think new ideas individuals contribute to changes in language....
Watermelons and pineapples seem quite different when you first think about them and some factors do, but they are similar in many different ways. First, they are both fruits and they both contain juice which makes them the perfect thing to put in smoothies or on top of desserts. Secondly, they both have an ‘outer shell’ of sorts that helps protect the inside. Both have bright colors on the inside and darker colors on the outside. Additionally, both are refreshing and could help people cool down in the heat.
Many things make the two fruits different too. A watermelon covering is smooth and bright shades of green and the inside is a dark pale shade of pink, while a pineapple’s covering is a brown color, and it is rough and pointed in places and has a bright yellow interior. Watermelon is also heavier than a pineapple is, and it is cut in a separate way than a pineapple would be cut. While watermelons naturally have seeds in them, pineapples do not have seeds unless they are grown next to each other. Pineapple contains more Vitamin C than watermelons, but watermelon contains more Vitamin A. Watermelons are also messier because they contain more juice.
I hope this helps you.
It is 203 words. (I believe, you may want to double-check it)
I did not look up anything other than the Vitamin A and C facts, so I aplogize if it needs to be more detailed.
Answer:
The true about office friendship is office friendships lead to a workplace in which socializing rarely occurs [A]. Working with friends can improve job fulfillment, efficiency, and productivity. Shortly, office friendships give you a sense of belonging and positivity that can contribute to an excellent job setting. However, both of you participate similarly in the workplace, where they evaluate their performance and offer promotions. Therefore, he/she is an indirect competitor to you.
Further Explanation:
Build a friendship with your coworker is a complicated thing. Office friendships present difficulties that do not experience personal social interaction. You need to strike a balance between your private requirements and the harmony and contribution needs of the workplace. One of the primary concerns you are worried about a close relationship between other staff. Your coworkers may wonder if you speak behind the backs of people.
For instance, it can make individuals nervous and can affect your credibility, even if it seems you are spreading rumors or laughing at coworkers. If you feel a discussion with your friend turning negative, attempt to maintain stuff going or to suggest that you connect outside working hours.
Learn more
If you’re interested in learning more about this topic, we recommend you to also take a look at the following questions:
• The meaning of friendship: brainly.com/question/3211969
• Compare and contrast a casual friendship with a close friendship: brainly.com/question/3075336
Keyword: office friendship
Subject: English
Class: College
Sub-chapter: Communication
