Answer:
The best option concerning how Grendel's characterization in "Beowulf" differs from his characterization is "Grendel" is:
B. In "Beowulf" he is a static character, but in "Grendel" he is a dynamic character.
Explanation:
In literature, a static character is one that does not undergo important change. He is basically the same from beginning to ending. On the other hand, a dynamic character does go through important internal changes as the plot unfolds. Those changes can be emotional or psychological, for instance.
In the epic poem "Beowulf", the character Grendel is described as a monster incapable of feeling. He seems to exist solely with the purpose of terrorizing and killing men. However, in John Gardner's "Grendel", the character is developed further. He has feelings, and he suffers precisely because he is not capable of conveying those feelings. His actions are misinterpreted, his monstrous appearance being all everyone can see and judge upon. Thus, we can safely say that, in "Beowulf", Grendel is a static character, while in "Grendel" he is a dynamic character.
Good to know
I don’t have a cat
Answer: We planned to take a trip to Asia in three years or less.
Explanation:
The correct answer is ''We planned to take a trip to Asia in three years or less.'' The modifier in this case If we assume that the modifier is the trip that is going to happen, we will put next to it something that modifies in and that are those three years or less. Modifier must go next to something that it is modifying. Also, in this case, it can planning.
The way the author builds tension in this excerpt of 'The Phantom Rickshaw?" is by providing detailed descriptions of the setting and characters
<h3>What is a Setting?</h3>
This refers to the physical location of a scene or the historical significance that is used to advance a plot.
Hence, we can see that The way the author builds tension in this excerpt of 'The Phantom Rickshaw?" is by providing detailed descriptions of the setting and characters
Read more about setting here:
brainly.com/question/25605883
#SPJ1
It describes what the narrator knows from his past.
The narrator describes the demeanor of his childhood friend in the past. The narrator does not know how his childhood friend is in present time, so he uses what he knows from the past for comparison throughout the story. Until of course they finally reunite.
