Interpretive claims is not necessary in a historical essay.
<u>Answer:</u> Option D
<u>Explanation:</u>
A historical essay is defined as an essay illustrating assertions about historic events that are substantiated by adequate evidence to give the viewers a greater clarity and knowledge of that specific event.
Interpretive claims are points of view which are explored and evaluated in an essay. Although interpretive claims could be well-versed and advocated by historical record, it is regarded subjective since the writer uses it to voice their opinion. They are not essential for a historical essay because those claims represent the writer's opinion or perception of an event or topic that is not far mandated in a historical essay.
Answer:
D) calculating the costs of all options.
Explanation:
The first step in understanding the costs and benefits of a decision is calculating the costs of all options.
give brainliset please!
hope this helps :)
Yes it does congress can vote two-thirds majority
As soon as Israel had sovereignty in 1948 weaponized problems started
Explanation:
The Laws of William the Conqueror. The laws introduced by William the Conqueror after his victory at Hastings in 1066, had an impact on everybody in England. These laws were introduced by William to control the English. William has gained a reputation of being nothing more than a tyrant in England.
