A. Casca firmly reverses his position about including Cicero, as if he hadn't been the one to suggest it in the first place
C. Casca thinks he is making important decisions when Brutus is really the one leading the way
Explanation:
The ironic thing about discussing whether or not to include Cicero in the conspiracy is that Casca firmly reverses his position about including Cicero, as if he hadn't been the one to suggest it in the first place and Casca thinks he is making important decisions when Brutus is really the one leading the way.
An action becomes ironic when the eventual outcome is different from the intended outcome.
Which school of theory would be interested in looking for biographical/psychological interpretations of a text?<span>psychoanalytic criticism. Is all i could find.</span>
Answer: Because they were probably put in partners and bonded pretty easily
Explanation: Germany had young men fight or men that were of age to fight. Those men probably had comradeship because they to work together therefore creating a bond that will help them together to fight.
