Answer: the correct answer is nonreactive
Explanation: Using secondary data is considered an unobtrusive or <u>nonreactive</u> research method.
In a study by Briol and Petty, participants were exposed to strong or weak arguments on a topic while either shaking their heads or nodding their heads. A person would be more persuaded if they were shaking their head while listening to a flimsy argument.
Not all fallacious are inherently weak arguments. Because it is unfounded, an argument may be poor. Solving a mathematical equation is a classic example; if you made a mistake in the proof, it would not be regarded as "weak argument," just invalid. Because you only need to check for logical mistakes throughout the deductive process, invalid arguments are frequently simpler to identify.
A weak argument can't be flawed if it is based on untrue premises. For instance, "Video game playing encourages violent behaviour. This person spends a lot of time playing video games, so violence is probably in their future. The weak argument that playing video games is associated with violence is false, thus even though the argument is compelling, it is still flawed.
Learn more about weak argument here
brainly.com/question/13576121
#SPJ4
Answer:
C. ICS provides a structure for organizing field-level operations for a broad spectrum of incidents.
Explanation:
ICS was designed by recognizing the key activities or functions needed to effectively and efficiently respond to incidents. Examination of incident reports and the review of military organizations were all utilized in ICS development.
This analysis recognizes the elementary needs of incidents. As incidents became more complicated, complex, expensive, difficult and the need for an organizational manager became more obvious. Hence, in ICS, and particularly in bigger incidents, the Incident Commander is to manage the organization and not the incident.
