Answer:
A) They keep citizens and politicians informed about presidential policies, decisions, and plans.
Explanation:
The presidential press conferences are utilized by the president to <em>speak directly towards the people, and to maintain their policies that they have/or will implement, what stage the policy is at, and how, if it becomes law, will it affect the general public.</em> The president will also use the time to answer any pressing issues and questions that people of the general public may have, and that are asked by the press that are in the room. Typically, historical presidents would give ~2-3 press conferences every month, though more modern ones would give ~1 - 2 press conferences a month. They are also expected to give a press conference within a month. The only modern president to stray from the ordinary is President Biden, who has given the lowest amount of press conferences per month at 0.46, and took 64 days to give his first press conference.
Learn more about presidential press conferences, here:
brainly.com/question/10648990?referrer=searchResults - The first president to use television as part of their press conferences.
~
Answer:
The media helps tell us what to think about. They sway our thinkingby giving it direction, and spreading that direction to everyone's ears In that way media influences everyone.
Hope that helps.Have a good day
Answer:
What arguments could be made for removing the dictator?
Arguments for removing the dictator are: allowing the country to establish a democracy. Helping out or improving the situation of those demographic groups that were oppressed by the dictator. Another argument is simply punishing the dictator for his crimes.
What arguments could be made for keeping the dictator in power?
The main argument for keeping the dictator is to ensure the stability of the country, even if such stability is unfair at many times, and comes along with the oppresion of certain social and political groups.
Another argument is simply to prevent the country from getting worse.
A final argument is pragmatic: keeping the dictator in power might serve everyone's interests better. Democratic countries have frequently established ties with authoritarian governments.
– Trench Warfare was not very effective because it caused a stalemate between the sides.
<u>Further Explanation:-
</u>
<u>The feature of the western world which effected the way of fighting the war was the development of Trench Warfare. Once the war-related to ‘Race to Sea' got over, the conflict was now shifted to holding on to positions. To hold on to the positions,</u> The army wanted to keep themselves out from firing range of machine guns and for that, Soldiers had to dig down into defensive positions and that was when the trenches were introduced. The trenches were dug along the length along the front and it was very clear that these hastily dug ditches were made to be permanent and because of that, they involved into complex systems which were defensive on both the sides and the area which was opposing to this trenches was known as 'no Man's land'.<u> Trench warfare was considered as deadlier for attackers then defenders and attackers suffered twice the causalities during an assault on the trench line of Enemy. Because of all these attackers faced during an assault, The western front became one of the Stalemate.
</u>
Learn more:
1. According to Roger Williams, how did the English usually justify their attacks on the Indians?
<u>brainly.com/question/4891530
</u>
2. How did congress approach reconstruction after the civil war?
<u>brainly.com/question/507264
</u>
Grade – High School
Subject – History
Chapter – Trench Warfare
Keywords –Trench Warfare, Causalities, Assault, Attack, Defenders, Stalemate, Western Front, Soldiers, Guns, Defensive Positions, Ditches.
Answer:
is it turkeys? I know the americans had corn and wheat, so that's the only other thing that comes to mind
Explanation: