I would say <span>chinampas but I don't know for sure
</span>
Answer:
Labor
Explanation:
A. Well labor needed to be changed, in the New World (colonial times) labor wasn't in favor for the colonists but, slaves and indentured servants were. Mostly slaves had it bad, indentured servants were there to work for you for a couple of years to pay of their debt and a free ride to the new world. America only wanted a way to keep people as their workers to build, cook, and farm for them. So they came up with slaves. Slaves were African people who were forced to work for their owners till they die.
B. To make "changes" Britain kept coming up with acts to set up the colonists.
C. Although their making only started wars and fights. So they weren't that successful.
D. Today we pay people to do their work but the people who did the work would not be kept. They'd still have their rights as humans.
(Hopefully this helped!!! <3 )
Simply, the working conditions were terrible during the industrial revolution<span>. As factories were being built, businesses were in need of workers. With a long line of people willing to work, employers could set wages as low as they wanted because people were willing to do work as long as they got paid.</span>
Middle class doubled in the years between 1900 and 1925
.
C. middle class
<u>Explanation</u>:
It presents that first comprehensive, long-run payroll knowledge on Swedish middle-class employees ere the twentieth century. Our data cover, for example, academy teachers, instructors, assistants, policemen and porters in Stockholm and Sweden, ca. 1830–1940.
We utilise the current data to analyse the annual incomes of these middle-class workers with the annual incomes of farmworkers, uneducated production operators and manufacturing workers.
The outcomes show that the pay gap between the middle class and the working class grow drastically from the mid-nineteenth century to a historically high level throughout the 1880s and 1890s.
