Answer:
Clay believed that if Texas is be received into the Union as an integral part of it then it will destabilize the union and instead of acquiring Texas, it is better to compose and harmonize the present union rather than introducing as new component that would further add to the existing element of discord and distraction. He said that acquisition of foreign land is not right if it is done for strengthening one part against another part of the common confederacy and this can lead to dissolution of the Union
Explanation:
Clay believed that if Texas is be received into the Union as an integral part of it then it will destabilize the union and instead of acquiring Texas, it is better to compose and harmonize the present union rather than introducing as new component that would further add to the existing element of discord and distraction. He said that acquisition of foreign land is not right if it is done for strengthening one part against another part of the common confederacy and this can lead to dissolution of the Union
Answer: articles of confederation
Explanation:
After the independemce of the United States from Great Britain, the Articles of Confederation was a written document that outlined the roles of the federal government.
The Articles of Confederation created a government that was made up of a Congress, that was given the power to make alliances, sign treaties, appoint foreign ambassador, declare war, appoint military officers, and manage relations with the Indians.
In short- no. He imposed some very unfair tariffs on the southern states, making it very hard to live, most of what he did were things that lead up to the civil war. But in this case, I suggest you do your research and do the essay, but I can tell you what he did. He inposed unfair tariffs on forgein goods, making them the same (expensive) prices on domestic goods, made in the north. In retaliation, South Carolina seceded, and used military action against them. He also made the federal reserve a thing I think.
