If the marginal product for that employee is greater than for the previous employee hired, it must be that there are gains from specialization
<h3>
What is marginal product ?</h3>
- The marginal product or marginal physical productivity of an input (factor of production) in economics, and particularly neoclassical economics, is the change in output that results from using one more unit of a specific input (for example, the change in output when a firm's labor is increased from five to six units), assuming that the quantities of other inputs are kept constant.
- The marginal product is the mathematical derivative of the production function with respect to that input if the output and the input are infinitely divisible, in which case the marginal "units" are infinitesimal.
- When more of one input, such as labor, is used while maintaining a constant level of the other input, such as capital, the marginal product initially rises according to the "rule" of declining marginal returns.
To learn more about marginal product with the given link
brainly.com/question/13623353
#SPJ4
Answer:
Net Income $12,400
Explanation:
Preparation of a corrected income statement.
GREENSTREAM INSURANCE Agency Income Statement For the Month Ended June 30
RevenuesService Revenue $42,000
[$40,000 +(20%* $10,000).]
Expenses:
Salaries and Wages Expense $17,300
($12,000 + $5,300)
Rent Expense 4,200
Depreciation Expense 3,300
($2,800 + $500)
Supplies Expense 2,800
($0 + $2,800)
Utilities Expense 1,200
($0 + $1,200)
Advertising Expense 800
Total expenses 29,600
Net Income $12,400
(42,000-29,600)
Therefore the net income for the corrected income statement will be $12,400
Answer:
(c) $5
Explanation:
Remember, To calculate marginal cost, we divide the change in production costs by the change in quantity.
In this example, the change in production cost is $200 (for hiring an additional worker) while the change in quantity of taco is 40 (increase in marginal productivity).
The marginal cost= $200/40
we get $5 as the marginal cost.
Answer:
Of course Jo-Anne Roberts can keep the apartment.
Explanation:
Jo-Anne and the previous owner of the apartment had a valid contract by which Jo-Anne was to pay $3.7 million for the apartment. She has already partially completed her performance on the contract, so the seller must perform his part of the contract.
