The accounts receivable subsidiary ledger is a book of accounts that provides supporting detail for Accounts Receivable.
Answer:
Below
Explanation:
a product recall from a manufacturer to return a product after the discovery of safety issues or product defects that might endanger the consumer or put the makers / seller at risk at legal action.
Starbucks reports net income for 2015 of $2,558.4 million. Its stockholders' equity is $5,716 million and $6,262 million for 2014 and 2015, respectively. a. Compute its return on equity for 2015. Round answer to one decimal place (ex: 0.2345 = 23.5%) Answer % b. Starbucks repurchased over $1.4 billion of its common stock in 2015. How did this repurchase affect Starbucks' ROE? ROE usually decreases since the repurchase of shares reduces the denominator (avg. stockholders' equity). ROE usually increases since the repurchase of shares reduces the denominator (avg. stockholders' equity). ROE usually increases since the repurchase of shares increases the denominator (avg. stockholders' equity). ROE usually decreases since the repurchase of shares increases the denominator (avg. stockholders' equity). c. Why do you think a company like Starbucks repurchases its own stock? Companies repurchase their own stock if they feel it overvalued by the market. Companies repurchase their own stock if they feel it undervalued by the market.
Answer:
Explanation:
The diagram and step by step solution to the answer can be seen in the attached image below
KINDLY NOTE: Self Employment tax (<u><em>which can be said to be a Medicare tax and Social Security paid by self-employed individuals. It is quite similar to the FICA and usually, they are withheld from an employee’s paycheck Medicare taxes and Social Security purposes.)</em></u> is not applicable to both and the AMT is less then the actual normal tax liability so AMT provision also not applicable.
The product value and reputation of Nike, Inc. are being compromised by Nike Shoes.
<h3>
What is the Federal Trademark Dilution Act of 1995?</h3>
The Federal Trademark Dilution Act of 1995 amends the Trademark Act of 1946 to give the owner of a well-known mark the right to an injunction and compensation for another person's commercial use of a mark or trade name if that use starts after the mark has achieved notoriety and lessens the mark's distinctiveness.
It defines the criteria the court will use to decide whether a mark is distinctive. It restricts owners of such marks to injunctive remedies unless the person for whom the injunction is requested acted with malicious intent to exploit the owner's reputation or tarnish the mark. It offers further remedies if such intent is shown to have existed.
A person's possession of a valid registration under a specific Act or on the major register renders them completely immune from legal action taken under common or state law to protect the distinctiveness of a mark, label, or form of advertisement against them with regard to that registration.
Learn more about Federal Trademark Dilution Act of 1995 here:
brainly.com/question/15093618
#SPJ4
