Answer:
The team "was" beautiful in "their" movements.
Explanation:
Hope this helps :)
This story is not a usual one. It talks about how our views and ideas can be judgmental and hurtful. It puts us (readers) in a point where we start thinking about our own perspectives.
Explanation:
This story has two main components as symbols - belief and honesty. The author wants to describe the entire scene in darkness. He excludes elements that give us 'hope' in our lives.
The woman who the narrator loved deceived him. She portrayed to be a faithful, honest and innocent woman who loved him deeply. This was an impression that everyone had about her including the narrator.
The story starts off with an exclamation of grief, where he yells 'I had loved her madly!'. From this part of the story, he continues to talk and express his love/emotion towards his lover. He continues to suffer in her loss, goes to places where he can relive moments, visits her grave and sits there for hours. He reads the messages on the tombstones where the story ends.
The entire course of story makes us understand that he understand how she deceived him from the beginning till the end.
Answer:
Both excerpts present examples of legal oppression.
Explanation:
The excerpts presented in the question above are two examples of legal oppression, where someone or something possessing political power harmed a person or a group of people civilly, injuring the rights of citizens and causing civil and political damage through excess of authority. It is possible to reach this conclusion because in the first text, we can see that someone suspended all the laws adopted by a community, so that it could govern according to its own will. In the second text, we can see that a woman's property rights were taken away from her, because it did not seem profitable to someone with political power.
Answer:
D. He says that the people of three continents support his side, so his
side must be right.
Explanation:
By stating that the people of three continents support his side, so his
side in order to get others to agree with his views, he is using a bandwagon arguement. Bandwagon is basically when someone uses the fact that the majority agrees with something side person also supports, then their view is correct. Since the majority agrees, then the person they are trying to convice should too.
