Answer:
A. It has yet to be dated.
Explanation:
<em>Homo naledi</em> is a hominids species that was discovered in the Dinaledi Chamber of the Rising Star Cave system in South Africa in 2013. The expedition found more than 1550 specimens from at least 15 <em>Homo naledi</em> individuals. Another 133 specimens of at least 3 individuals were found on the nearby Lesedi Chamber. It is not true that the species is yet to be dated, as the fossils have been dated to between 335,000 and 236,000 years ago.
Usually yes. But the form of government and control that the US has is different, so they manage to manage these differences in order to be able to do their duty well in a coordinated manner.
Answer:
Efficacy versus effectiveness
Explanation:
Efficacy versus effectiveness are both the same term but are different to some extent. Both terms are used to describe and get the result of the research. But we can describe effectiveness and efficacy in the medical condition in a different context. Effectiveness in the medical condition is getting the result in the natural wold environment without any controlled condition. Whereas the efficacy is reverse from effectiveness as the efficacy is the result under the controlled condition. The efficacy described how the medicine is used in controlled or ideal conditions whereas the effectiveness described how the medicine works in an average clinical setting or the natural world environment.
I know that this is correct because I live in Michigan. The capital is Lansing, it was moved from Detroit when it collapsed. Plz mark brainliest, I need it to rank up!
Answer:
B) There is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that the true proportion is less than 21 percent.
Explanation:
According to a different source, these are the options that come with this question:
A) There is sufficient evidence to support the claim that the true proportion is less than 21percent.
B) There is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that the true proportion is less than 21percent.
C) There is sufficient evidence to support the claim that the true proportion is greater than 21percent.
D) There is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that the true proportion is greater than 21percent.
This would be the best way to explain what this conclusion means. The hypothesis states that more than 21% of the population suffers from professional problems due to extreme shyness. Moreover, the null hypothesis states that there is no meaningful relationship between two measured phenomena. If we "fail to reject" the hypothesis, this means that we do not have evidence that shows that the hypothesis is not true. Therefore, we can claim that there is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that the true proportion is less than 21 percent.
