Answer:
The official British reply to the colonial case on representation was that the colonies were “virtually” represented in Parliament in the same sense that the large voteless majority of the British public was represented by those who did vote. To this Otis snorted that, if the majority of the British people did not have the vote, they ought to have it. The idea of colonial members of Parliament, several times suggested, was never a likely solution because of problems of time and distance and because, from the colonists’ point of view, colonial members would not have adequate influence.
Answer:
I think it's C
Explanation:
Economic choice... It WOULD be that if you were talking about money.
Opportunity Cost... the loss of potential gain from other alternatives when one alternative is chosen. So it can not be that.
Scarcity... This one means that there is too little of something. So I used context clues to find that out.
Specialization... Oh, who cares anymore I answered the question!
Hope I helped! ☺
im pretty sure it was poland
The situation prevailing in a market in which buyers and sellers are so numerous and well informed that all elements of monopoly are absent and the market price of a commodity is beyond the control of individual buyers and sellers.
