Answer:
2.away this also my doubt???????????.????????????????
Answer: The answer is you can neither be fully supportive of the either. In fact the battle will go on or you may the arguments will perhaps get louder in the years to come.
Explanation: None of the nations wants to back from using a lucrative resources that they chance upon fully knowing the repercussions of climate change and various other damaging havoc that can impact the entire earth.
The greed in humans cannot be killed and perhaps we already are paying a heavy price for it. The conservationists believe the usage of the resources should be done in a responsible manner.
The supply need not be jeopardised for the future generations but no objections in continuing to use them though. Sustainability is the argument that they propound.
The preservationists are purists in the true sense they don't want to disturb mother nature and allow them to flourish in their pristine form and we continue to live in harmony with that.
The intrinsic value of the land and other resources have to retained and gained inspiration for its beauty and serenity. It is the theory that preservationists have stuck too for years.
Each is right in their own way, if we don't use the natural resources we won't be able to function as well as we do.
If we don't preserve some of the natural resources and stick our head into every resource on the surface of the earth, there will be large destruction and extinction of flora and fauna.
Hence it would be right to say, that we need to rethink what we are going to do because in the next few years what we do will determine our future and there is no going back then.
Diversity strengthens a community because everyone in it can learn something. For an example, each culture is taught and brought up a different way. The things they've learned may be different from the things that you were taught. Diversity can teach you to appreciate other cultures and how deal with new experiences when you go to different places. When a community can be accepting and understanding it actually makes the community better.
As for this problem together with the options presented with it, the most likely answer and the most probable one would be the last option which is D. All of the above.
In active listening, it is important to pay attention. This is to take note of the information being shared and how you can provide feedback later on. It is also important in active listening to show that you really are listening. Simple gestures like nodding of the head and having an open posture in addition to looking at the person in the eyes are signs that you are listening. Providing feedback is also an integral part in active listening, and quite the tricky one. Some people doesn't want feedback and some wanted to hear it. So it rests on the judgement of the active listener as to provide feedback or not, and what feedback is to be given.
Even though fish surpass the average protein content of edible insects. Edible insects still have a higher protein content, when you average out the protein content for the most consumed meats. In general edible insects contain the same amount of quality protein compared to meat.
